Options for presidential election 2009: Jusuf Kalla

Jusuf Wanandi ,  Jakarta   |  Tue, 06/23/2009 12:27 PM  |  Opinion

Writing about Jusuf Kalla (JK) in the 2009 presidential election is an encore for me because I wrote an op-ed piece for the Financial Times on the 2004 presidential election. I remember my stance on Jusuf Kalla then was negative because there was popular belief that as a student activist, he was behind the burning of churches in Makassar in 1967. That is how he was branded as being anti-Christian.

Kalla inherited the family business that he developed after the demise of his father, Hadji Kalla; and as a businessman he inevitably had to compete with other businessmen, be they Chinese-Indonesian or foreign. It was then that he was branded anti-Chinese and anti-foreign.

However, my view of Kalla gradually changed to the positive because what he did in resolving Muslim-Christian conflicts in Maluku (Malino I Agreement) and Poso, Central Sulawesi (Malino II Agreement). He achieved this single-handedly, when he was coordinating minister for the people's welfare during Megawati Soekarnoputri's presidency. He was successful because he had the legitimacy of being an east Indonesian leader. That dispelled my basic distrust of him as being anti-Christian.

As Vice President, Kalla showed much-needed leadership and resoluteness in facing Islamic extremism in Indonesia. A case in point was his quick action following the death of key Jamaah Islamiyah activist Dr. Azhari, in Batu, East Java, in November 2005, and the seized propaganda materials and CDs that contained the JI's extreme ideology.

Kalla was taken aback by those materials, and took the initiative of calling leaders of Muslim organizations to a meeting at his residence, including very conservative ones, to show them the materials. He demanded of them whether that was the kind of ideology they wanted to see adopted in Indonesia.

If not, he challenged them to find ways to win over such ideology. The leaders present made a pledge to counter the extremism in their own ways and to cooperate to prevent the subversion of Islam in Indonesia.

As a leader, Kalla has the commitment and authority to exert his influence over Muslim leaders to fight extremist activities.

His main achievement was undoubtedly the Aceh peace agreement, which put to an end 23 years of civil war and insurgency. On his own initiative, he began approaching the leaders of the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) in October 2004, before his move to the vice president's office. The suffering and destruction wreaked by the tsunami in 2006 led Kalla to use it as an impetus to move on with his efforts to seek the final resolution of the Aceh conflict.

In addition, he made a lot of efforts to help and support the Papuan quest for special autonomy, although the situation in the province was more complicated, due partly to the tribalism that prevails there.

Overall, Kalla has done a lot to support the Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono government, especially in the economic field, as agreed by Yudhoyono and Kalla at the outset of the then new government. He is pragmatic in his economic outlook, and as such he has been open enough in his view on globalization, albeit still harboring previous biases and notions as a businessman that Indonesia has to build its national economy.

In facing the current economic crisis, government intervention is necessary and should increase. Examples of failures of socialism are still fresh in our mind, and globalization is the main trend in the international economy.

The national interest is important, but international relations in a global community are a necessity. Kalla should be able to balance the two aspects of the economy.

Another plus is his quick mind and willingness to answer any question. He sometimes "blinks" and does not think deeply. Some of his answers are gut reactions, especially on issues he does not know very well. He tends to speak very fast and sometimes unclearly, which often causes some misunderstanding. The positive side of Kalla is that he is open and egalitarian in entertaining questions.

While his English is adequate for addressing a small group, for dealing with a wider audience, however, he would be better off reading out a prepared text or using a good interpreter.

On the anti-Chinese stigmatization that Kalla bears, I believe it is unfounded, as I got to him better through my many discussions with him on various issues. He may sound nationalistic, but he is also open to compromise and is willing to discuss all issues further.

Criticism over his and his family's businesses abounds. Kalla should take them in stride because he really understands the problems. While doing business is everybody's right, however, once one is voted into public office one should stop and make sure there is no whiff or smell of conflict of interest between the family and the state.

People's trust in clean government is absolutely necessary, without which office holders may not be able to run the government. It is a sacrifice, but a necessary one for the good of the people and for the success of the governance.

The writer is vice chairman for the CSIS Foundation's board of trustees.

Comments (4)  |   Post comment
A  |   A  |   A  |   Mail to a friend  |  Printer Friendly Version |  Digg it!  |  Add to Del.icio.us!  |  Add to Reddit!  |  Stumble it!   |  Share on facebook  

I'm not going to give much confidence to JK in reforming the government and create good governance. He obvious doesn't care whether the government is clean or not, I recalled that he once asked to give greater protection to the bureaucrats as oppose to greater accountability, especially when the bureaucrats complain about the anti corruption movement. I'm sure what he has in mine is how the government be friendly to his and his friends business interest.
Sure we heard rumors about his and his friends business interest in many government projects, especially infrastructure.
The most ridiculous one, when he pressed Sri Mulyani to give financial guarantee in Monorail Project, which I found out later it was run by one of his companies. Of course there was nothing wrong with that, wasn't it ?. Don't know let people decide it ... Happy Pemilu !!!

In my opinion, JK was a great leader in a lot of aspects such as politics, social, culture, economics. but the most impression is the way he run the public bureucracy.....i believe it will be a great dela of administrative reform and entrepreneurship government......

Dear reader,
I think, there has been a great optimism in related to the presidential election 2009 to Indonesian people. People become very critical and smart to see the problems happening to this country. It can be clearly seen that there are many people involved actively on watching the presidential debate hold on television.

I think, it is clear enough that Indonesian people needs a new president and the vice president to run the state bureaucracy efficiently and effectively for the future. People needs good government, the better public service, and demolish any kind of corruption.

However, we are supporting whoever elected in the coming presidential election 2009. We need to open our mind and heart widely to appreciate the elected president and vice president. And Indonesia country will be better than before.

i agree that kalla is someone who understand the problems, and understand how to solve them. the way he speaks (concise and direct) is also a big plus, at least compared to the way yudhoyono's speaks (lengthy, indirect, and thus boring).

however, family business is really a problem, even if indonesia had sophisticated legal system. in western world, business is normally not family affair. thus, if a businessman (be an entrepeneur or a corporate board member) wants to enter politics/bureaucracy, he just needs to sell his shares to severe his connection to his former business.

but, if the business is a family business with the ruling family is very dominant, i don't think here is any way to severe the former businessman's connection to his former business

What's On