Jakarta Post

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post
The Jakarta Post
Video Weather icon 30°C
DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
30°C Partly Cloudy

Dry and mostly cloudy throughout the day.

  • Wed

    26℃ - 32℃

  • Thu

    25℃ - 32℃

  • Fri

    25℃ - 31℃

  • Sat

    26℃ - 30℃

KPK to speak up against House inquiry in court  

  • Kharishar Kahfi
    Kharishar Kahfi

    The Jakarta Post

Jakarta | Thu, September 14, 2017 | 06:54 pm
KPK to speak up against House inquiry in court   Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) headquarters in South Jakarta. (JP/Wienda Parwitasari)

The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has said it is ready to present its opinion in a judicial review hearing challenging the House of Representatives’ right to launch an inquiry against it at the Constitutional Court.

The antigraft body said the judicial review petitioners had asked it to attend the hearing as it was considered a relevant party in the case.

“The request [to testify] has been made as the judicial review motion is related to our authorities. We will give relevant testimony and evidence [in the hearing],” Febri said on Thursday at the KPK headquarters in Jakarta.

A KPK workers’ union and several civil society groups have filed a judicial review petition against the 2003 law on legislative bodies, which outlines institutions that are subject to a political inquiry by the House.

The petitioners and the KPK argued that the House was not authorized to launch an inquiry against the KPK as it was an independent state institution.

The House has launched an inquiry into the KPK as it believes the latter has become a superbody and is plagued with irregularities. Activists, however, have said the House’s move was nothing but a thinly veiled attempt by lawmakers to weaken the commission as it was launched shortly after it opened an investigation into a major graft case implicating dozens of active and former lawmakers.

The petitioners had asked the court to issue a provisional ruling suspending the House’s inquiry, but the request had been rejected. (ary)


Join the discussions