Jakarta Post

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post
The Jakarta Post
Video Weather icon 30°C
DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
30°C Partly Cloudy

Dry and mostly cloudy throughout the day.

  • Wed

    26℃ - 32℃

  • Thu

    25℃ - 32℃

  • Fri

    25℃ - 31℃

  • Sat

    26℃ - 30℃

Court maintains presidential threshold

  • Marguerite Afra Sapiie
    Marguerite Afra Sapiie

    The Jakarta Post

Jakarta | Thu, January 11, 2018 | 06:38 pm
Court maintains presidential threshold Enthusiastic -- King of dangdut Rhoma Irama (front, center) responds to queries during a media conference after the Benign Islam Party national working meeting in Depok, West Java, on Jan. 8. (JP/Nurul Fitri Ramadhani)

The Constitutional Court has rejected a petition to scrap the presidential threshold, which is stipulated in Article 222 of the 2017 Elections Law.

The court rejected on Thursday a judicial review petition filed by the Benign Islam Party (Idaman Party), which challenged the presidential threshold set for the 2019 election.

Article 222 stipulates that a party or coalition of parties is required to secure at least 20 percent of the seats at the House of Representatives or 25 percent of the popular vote to be eligible to nominate a presidential candidate in next year's election.

Justice Maria Farida said the threshold was a legal policy in elections that ensured the simplification of the multiparty system and strengthened the presidential system.

She said the court issued a similar ruling in 2009 concerning an article in the 2008 Elections Law, which said the presidential threshold was a legal requirement of the legislative body.

"The plaintiff's request regarding the threshold for political parties has no legal basis," Maria said.

Among the nine justices on the bench, justice Saldi Isra and Suhartoyo gave dissenting opinions. They argued that the article contradicted the Constitution, which ensured equal rights for every party to nominate a presidential candidate.

The presidential threshold was also challenged by the Association for Elections and Democracy (Perludem), judiciary watchdog KoDe Inisiatif and several activists. (ebf)

 

Join the discussions