TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsBrand leadership in the digital era
Technology has made it much easier to enable interactions among people, especially with social media becoming a favorite hangout place online.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Technology has made it much easier to enable interactions among people, especially with social media becoming a favorite hangout place online.
(Shutterstock/File)
C
lassical literature on branding explains that in order to build a strong brand, it is necessary to determine the right direction, purpose and meaning of the brand. This is called brand identity (David Aaker, 1996).
Brand identity will help establish a relationship between the brand and its customers by generating a value proposition involving functional and emotional benefits.
Furthermore, Aaker explains that brand identity can be shaped around four perspectives: the brand-as-product, which includes product attributes, quality, value, user, use and country of origin; the brand-as-symbol, as in visual imagery and heritage; brand-as-institution, or organizational attributes; and brandas-person, including brand personality and the brand-customer relationship.
Meanwhile, research conducted by Hill Holliday and Lippincot (2013) asserted that trust in institutions has eroded drastically in the past few years.
This is hailed as the end of the institutional era and the beginning of what they call the human era. They believe that this trend has been spurring companies’ desire to behave more like people.
In view of the declining customer confidence in institutions, the company would need to emphasize more on the identity of a brand as a person. This approach would position brands like human beings, not as an organization or institution “amid” its customers.
With this kind of a philosophy, companies can build brand leadership in this new era.
