TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsFix the ailing BPJS Kesehatan, or else
What is most important in dealing with this quandary is the ability to look beyond the deficit and get to the root causes of the problem.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Primary school students and residents bring recyclable trash to get free healthcare services that could cover BPJS Kesehatan premiums. (JP/Aman Rochman)
F
or many of us, reports of the Rp 9 trillion (US$ 630 million) deficit the Healthcare and Social Security Agency (BPJS Kesehatan) is suffering come almost as a foregone conclusion.
Ever since it was launched in 2014, BPJS Kesehatan has been struggling to stay financially healthy. The universal healthcare scheme has been beset by financial deficits and has only been viable because of the massive subsidies injected by the government.
Questions linger over the scheme’s long term sustainability in providing health care to Indonesians, particularly those most in need. As pointed out by BPJS Kesehatan director Fahmi Idris, much of the problem lies with the low compliance rate in paying premiums.
Now in its fourth consecutive year of deficit, it is imperative that the government comes up with an alternative course of action to secure the insurance scheme without putting unnecessary strain on the state budget.
A number of options to secure BPJS Kesehatan financially have been explored. The most popular one revolves around a plan to increase premiums and improve compliance in paying the premium. Another option is using cigarette excise to plug the deficit.
While these proposals appear plausible, deeper scrutiny is needed. Increasing premiums looks logical and may immediately deal with the deficit, but it will leave behind those who are just above the poverty line but do not qualify for coverage by the government.
It goes without saying that improving compliance in paying premiums should be intensified. However, to ensure successful implementation, incentive and disincentive mechanisms are required.
