The 2018 G20 Summit in Buenos Aires concluded in a spirit of consensus. While some would argue that the final declaration was, to many extent, watered-down.
The 2018 G20 Summit in Buenos Aires concluded in a spirit of consensus. While some would argue that the final declaration was, to many extent, watered-down, for many it was a better-than-nothing outcome so long as it captures the consensus on high importance including climate change, trade, refugees and migration, as well as those relatively non-contentious issues such as digitalization, development and education.
Having participated directly in the process, I would like to share some reflections. These include the working methods, the role of the summit’s leadership as well as the agenda setting.
The G20 is known to be an informal, non-binding, and consensus-based dialogue forum. It possesses no secretariat to record meeting results and their follow-ups. The accountability of the forum rests on the voluntary compliance of its members.
While such a characteristic allows for members to speak openly to each other without fearing legal consequences, it undeniably calls into question the ability of the G20 to concretely address pressing challenges. Nevertheless, a G20 Summit has been useful as an avenue that facilitates talks between leaders. For example, the trade truce between United States President Donald Trump and China’s Xi Jinping was reached during last week’s summit.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.