Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Dialogue only way forward on Rohingya crisis

  • Noeleen Heyzer


Singapore   /   Thu, October 31, 2019   /   02:16 pm
Dialogue only way forward on Rohingya crisis Rohingya refugees shout slogans at a protest against a disputed repatriation program at the Unchiprang refugee camp near Teknaf, Bangladesh. Frightened and angry Rohingya refugees forced Bangladesh to call off efforts to start sending back some of the hundreds of thousands of the stateless Muslims to Myanmar, casting fresh doubt on a disputed repatriation program. (AFP/Dibyangshu Sarkar)

At the 33rd ASEAN summit in Singapore last year, the issue of the Rakhine/Rohingya crisis was high on the agenda. The chairman’s statement expressed ASEAN’s readiness to support Myanmar in the repatriation process by conducting a needs assessment in the Rakhine state.

It also recognized the need to find comprehensive and durable solutions to the crisis and to create conducive conditions for refugees to return and rebuild their lives and encouraged Myanmar to take forward the implementation of the recommendations of the Rakhine Advisory Commission led by the late United Nations secretary-general Kofi Annan.

A year later, on the eve of the 35th ASEAN Summit in Thailand (slated for Oct. 31 to Nov. 4), things have not moved forward as hoped. Not a single Rohingya has agreed voluntarily to the official repatriation process, and while Myanmar has developed physical infrastructure in Rakhine in preparation for repatriation, too little has been done to guarantee security and basic rights of the Rohingya to convince them to return.

Bangladesh, now host to more than 1 million Rohingya refugees, has become increasingly frustrated at what it perceives to be a lack of progress on Myanmar’s side in creating conducive conditions for return, and Myanmar has accused Bangladesh of delaying the repatriation process.

Thus, instead of confidence building, over the last year, more trust has been lost between Myanmar and Bangladesh as well as between Myanmar and Rohingya refugees in the camps in Cox’s Bazar. If there are any lessons to be learned for ASEAN, it is that rushing into repatriation without building a foundation of trust is not possible. Therefore, if ASEAN is to help Myanmar find a way forward in addressing this crisis, it must prioritize trust-building and dialogue.

ASEAN and Myanmar have done some things right in their engagement on this complex crisis. Most significantly, in late July 2019, in line with a recommendation of the ASEAN-Emergency Reponse and Assessment Team’s (ERAT) preliminary needs assessment, Myanmar sent a delegation from their Foreign Ministry, accompanied by ASEAN-ERAT team members, to visit Cox’s Bazar and hold a dialogue with Bangladesh government officials and with Rohingya refugees in the camps. The visit was an important confidence-building measure by Myanmar, one that was warmly welcomed by Bangladesh and, most importantly, Rohingya refugees themselves.

While no agreement was reached between the Myanmar delegation and the refugee representatives, the dialogue showed goodwill on both sides to engage in much-needed discussions about the repatriation process that Myanmar was offering, and refugees articulated their concerns and conditions for returning voluntarily.

The Myanmar delegation promised to communicate the requests of the refugees to the Myanmar government and to follow-up with the next dialogue within three months. Unfortunately, the dialogue has so far not been followed up.

Instead, Myanmar decided to push ahead with yet another attempt at repatriation on Aug. 22, which came as a surprise to refugees as well as to ASEAN.


Myanmar will certainly need time to address fundamental issues in Rakhine state.


The result of the August repatriation attempt, to Myanmar and ASEAN’s disappointment, was that not a single Rohingya refugee agreed to return voluntarily to Rakhine state. The impact of the failed attempt was that it left Rohingya refugees feeling betrayed again, and further strained relations between Bangladesh and Myanmar.

On the part of the refugees, the vast majority do, in fact, wish to return to Rakhine state, and have even launched their own “Going home” campaign. Their demands are clear: security, citizenship, access to education, On Aug. 25, thousands of Rohingya refugees commemorated the second anniversary of their exodus to Bangladesh with the call “Talk to us”.

They have also consistently asked for ASEAN to play a mediation role in a dialogue process between the Myanmar government and Rohingya refugee representatives.

Myanmar will certainly need time to address fundamental issues in Rakhine state. In the meantime, however, we cannot afford to lose more trust and hope. ASEAN should offer to facilitate a process of “Go home” Dialogues between Myanmar and Rohingya refugees in Cox’s Bazar in order to build a foundation of trust needed for voluntary repatriation to happen.

This can easily be done within the framework of the implementation of the ASEAN-ERAT preliminary needs assessment recommendation, which has already been agreed to by Myanmar, led by a team of mediators and independent facilitators under the good office of the ASEAN Secretary-General.

In doing so, we must ensure that dialogue is conducted with a wide group of refugees, including women and youth, in line with UN Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 2418.

ASEAN leaders must realize that its credibility is at stake in the way it handles the Rohingya crisis and that for all our efforts over the past year, the situation remains at an impasse.

While solutions will not be found overnight, the process of trust-building cannot wait. The way forward is dialogue.


Member of the United Nations secretary-general’s high-level advisory board on mediation and distinguished fellow at Singapore Management University and the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the official stance of The Jakarta Post.