Komnas HAM chairman Imdadun Rahmat said the investigation should not only show a transparent and fair legal process, but would also serve to demonstrate whether internal reform of the police had indeed occurred.

“We hope this case will be seen as proof of the implementation of freedom of expression and information distribution. If the case involves criminal charges, I will be forced to severely doubt that the internal reform process in the National Police has genuinely occurred,” Imdadun told journalists on Wednesday. He was referring to the spread of executed convict Freddy Budiman’s testimony to Haris, in which the drug lord claimed he had made deals with members of the National Police, Indonesian Military (TNI) and National Narcotics Agency (BNN) in running his drug businesses.

Imdadun said if the National Police decided to prosecute Aris, it would create a bad precedent because the public would become reluctant to report information to mass media or the police on worries they too would be prosecuted.

On Tuesday, the National Police, TNI and BNN reported Haris to the police's Criminal Investigation Department (Bareskrim), accusing him of violating the 2008 Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law.

Freddy’s testimony was circulated one day before he was executed on Nusakambangan prison island in Cilacap, Central Java, on July 29.

Haris circulated Freddy's testimony on the alleged involvement of personnel from the three institutions in his international drug network through social media.

Citing an example, Freddy said in his statement that a Chinese-manufactured ecstasy pill cost only Rp 5,000 (38 US cents) each to produce, and that he did not as such mind giving Indonesian law enforcement personnel Rp 5,000 to Rp 10,000 per pill smuggled into Indonesia, in exchange for protection. (ebf)

Popular

The fragile promise of pluralism, religious freedom in Southeast Asia

Furniture exporters decry new quarantine rule

BRICS shows internal rifts as ministers fall short of joint statement