TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Indonesia plans to keep direct elections in democratically ‘mature’ provinces. Papua may be left out.
Indonesias 416 regencies and 98 municipalities have one thing in common: They hold direct elections to pick their local leaders. But the government has indicated that that might be about to change.
Change Size
A voter collects a ballot from an election official in June 2018 at a polling station in Abepura district, Jayapura, to vote in the Papua gubernatorial election. JP/Nethy Dharma Somba (JP/Nethy Dharma Somba)
A
cross its more than 17,000 islands, Indonesia is divided into 34 provinces, consisting of 416 regencies and 98 municipalities, ranging from Surabaya with more than 2.8 million residents to Tambrauw regency in Papua with only around 6,300.
With the exception of the administrative municipalities of Jakarta and the special region of Yogyakarta, where the governorship is an inherited office, all these provinces, regencies and municipalities have one thing in common: They hold direct regional elections to pick their local leaders for five-year terms. The government has indicated that that might be about to change.
One of Home Minister Tito Karnavian’s many suggestions to "evaluate" direct regional elections made over the past few weeks is an "asymmetrical" approach, in which some regions hold direct elections, while others, particularly conflict-prone ones such as Papua, do not.
“With direct regional elections, besides the potential of conflict in some regions with shootouts happening between tribes, identity politics is also on the rise,” Tito said on Monday. “Maybe the evaluation will find that [we should hold] asymmetrical regional elections.”
He added that he had asked Statistics Indonesia (BPS) to create a "democratic maturity index" to indicate regions in which the potential drawbacks of direct regional elections outweigh whatever benefits they might bring.
“We should look at which regions are ready and which are not,” he said. “In big cities [voters] may be ready, so we will carry out [direct regional elections]. But in other regions with a low index, maybe because the level of [political savvy] among the public is still low, resulting in candidates’ programs not being understood, we can perhaps hold elections in another form.”
While it remains unclear what exactly Tito’s “maturity index” would measure, state agencies have already devised a few indicators that could be used to evaluate the quality of democracy in regions as well as how vulnerable a particular region is to problems when holding elections.
