TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Manila can’t confirm Chinese bomber flight over Scarborough
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
A Chinese H-6K long range bomber flies over Panatag (Scarborough) Shoal in the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone after the UN Permanent Court of Arbitration trashed China's 9-Dash Line claim. (Screengrab from China’s State Council Information Office Twitter page/Inquirer/-)
T
he Philippine government said it is still checking reports that China flew one of its nuclear-capable bombers over the Scarborough Shoal last week.
“We cannot confirm that because we do not have any [information] from our side. We cannot confirm it, not even our allies can confirm it,” Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana told reporters on Tuesday at Camp Aguinaldo.
China’s State Council Information Office posted on Twitter last week the photos of its H-6K bomber flying over the contested shoal a few days after the international arbitration court ruled in favor of the Philippines in its maritime case against China over the South China Sea on July 12.
“I think that news was issued by a daily from China so we don’t know if it’s true or not, or if it’s just a propaganda by them,” the defense chief said.
The H-6K is described as a strategic bomber capable of attacking US carrier battle groups and priority targets in Asia.
Last week, The Hague arbitration court said in its decision over the maritime case that China’s nine-dash claims in the South China Sea had no legal basis.
Lorenzana said there was nothing new in China’s stance even after the ruling.
“They have been defying the ruling since it was issued. In fact they have been saying they will not abide by the ruling when we filed the case in 2012, so walang pinagbago [nothing has changed],” he said.
