It is strikingly inequitable to compare the poorest regions in Indonesia with the wealthiest region in Spain, but what is certain is that Papua and West Papua enjoy more autonomy, more representation and more attention than before.
s Catalans are pushing for independence through a contentious referendum, their struggle is being monitored by secessionists around the world, including Papuans.
It is enigmatic to imagine a referendum for the holy grail of statehood will happen twice in Papua for two reasons.
First, the Catalans’ referendum contravenes all the prevailing rules, making their future unclear while the international community is reluctant to recognize their aspired independency.
Second, Papuans had their referendum in 1969. Held in eight districts, the referendum unanimously stipulated that West Papuans voted to reintegrate with Indonesia.
The international community was represented by all members of the United Nations General Assembly, which approved the referendum’s result by adopting UN Resolution 2504, consisting of 84 countries voting in favor, 30 countries abstaining and no single country voting against it. This gives the referendum legitimacy.
Nevertheless, Indonesian policymakers seem to forget a new loophole that is visible only within the theoretical discourse of international law.
As international law is evolving and influencing recent secession cases, Catalan’s referendum effects for Papuan secessionists can be worrisome.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.