TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Dutch court dismisses Chinese plea for mummy's return
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Illustration of a monk and Buddha (Shutterstock/Therd Oval)
A
court in Amsterdam on Wednesday dismissed a case brought by Chinese villagers who sought the return of a stolen 1,000-year-old mummified monk they said had been obtained by a Dutch collector.
The small eastern Chinese village of Yangchun has accused Oscar van Overeem of having bought the Buddha statue containing the remains of a monk in Hong Kong in 1996.
The human-sized Buddha in a lotus position, called the "Zhanggong Patriarch", disappeared from a temple in Yangchun in late 1995 after being worshipped there for centuries.
Missing for two decades, villagers in 2015 recognized the precious artefact as part of a display at the "Mummy World Exhibition" at Budapest's Natural History Museum.
The statue was subsequently withdrawn.
Read also: Egypt unearths eight ancient mummies
A scan of the statue revealed a skeleton inside -- said to be that of the monk who lived nearly a millenium ago during China's Song dynasty.
But Dutch judges said Wednesday that the Chinese village committee, which had brought the case, "cannot be considered a legal entity, and is therefore declared inadmissible".
"This means the tribunal will not deal with the case in substance," it said in a statement.
Van Overeem, an architect, repeatedly insisted during the hearings that he no longer had the statue, which he said he exchanged in a swap with an anonymous Chinese collector in 2015.
Previous retrievals of Chinese artifacts have been done through diplomatic channels.
Beijing in recent years has vehemently protested the sale of artifacts that it said were stolen, particularly in the 19th century when European powers began encroaching on Chinese territory.
