Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsCan't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsKeeping the UN in New York now risks turning its headquarters into a relic of past American aspirations, but where some voices remain privileged, others silenced and most go unheard.
very time the United Nations General Assembly convenes in September in New York City, the world is meant to gather in one place to reaffirm the spirit of multilateralism.
But the atmosphere this year could not be further removed from that vision.
United States President Donald Trump returned to the podium with a speech that was openly hostile to the UN system, while Washington’s refusal to issue visas for the Palestinian delegation underscored how the Gaza war has been politicized in ways that threatens the credibility of the UN as a forum for all.
It is time to ask the previously unthinkable: Should the UN remain headquartered in New York?
When the UN Charter was signed in San Francisco in 1945 and the headquarters was established in New York a few years later, the US was the undisputed leader of the free world.
Hosting the UN was symbolic of America’s commitment to a rules-based order, for which it was willing to bear the logistical weight of hosting global diplomacy.
But that era has long passed.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.