The Jakarta Post
The blackout on Sunday in Greater Jakarta and parts of West Java was said to be the worst in many years.
Family and friends’ gatherings were still cheerful but hot as houses lost their air-con; the new pride of President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo and that of Jakartans, the MRT, seemed to blush in shame as the power back up, it turned out, was for the stations and not ready yet for the MRT itself — from which passengers had to be evacuated.
Gone was all the talk of the digital revolution and the cashless world as people suddenly found they had to rummage for cash for transactions.
We’re still waiting for the results of an investigation into what happened following the President’s stone-faced response; so speculations range from inadequate backup, slow contingency measures to allegations of sabotage and even whether a single big tree growing near a high voltage tower upset the whole network.
Amid lambasting of the state electricity company PLN were the mirthless smirks from outside Java. “Putri Riau” (Riau daughter) tweeted with smiling and laughing emoji, “Friends in Java, did the power go out again? We get that daily, you know. If development cannot be disbursed equally, well at least the blackouts can.”
Grumbling Jakartans simply sauntered off to cafes and malls where the generators helped to charge their phones and laptops.
Blackouts have been part of life for way too long in major cities of provinces such as in mineral rich Riau, Aceh, Papua and East Kalimantan — so are other inconveniences which are rare in the capital such as disrupted fuel supply, leading to frequent long queues outside Java.
When long queues for gasoline occurred in Jakarta, the typical mockery from other cities was, “You went through just one day of long queues for gas and you’re whining? Try queuing for likely non existent fuel!”
Another injustice in luar Jawa — the term “outside Java” reflecting where the center of everything is — is the annual haze from forest fires which killed around 20 in 2015, an estimated 100,000 premature deaths because of the haze according to one study, and the closing of schools even in neighboring Malaysia and Singapore, where residents are bracing for life in foul smelling smog again. Recently six provinces in Indonesia have declared an emergency, anticipating worsening haze.
What is stunning is not only the fires themselves — it’s the willful neglect of politicians even regarding the health of fellow citizens, let alone neighbors. For over a decade, lawmakers in Jakarta, where the haze never choked them, refused to pass the law to make the 2002 ASEAN agreement binding for Indonesia, to enable neighbors rush to help each other to stop fires, though only by request.
The law on transboundary haze was finally passed in 2014. The next year president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono repeated apologies already expressed in 2013 for the forest fires, and politicians rebuked him.
Chauvinistic nationalism against smaller neighbors is the only clear explanation to such disregard of the potentially lethal exposure of the smog particularly to children.
The blackout has reminded us not only of our precarious reliance on Indonesia’s coal-dominated power generation despite lofty pledges to go green.
The fuming against PLN reminds us of such chronically ignored inconveniences outside Java, which lack comparable headlines.
Extreme, intergenerational injustices perceived in one part of a country was termed “internal colonialism” by sociologists since the 1960s — which helped explain pent-up anger in places from far away Northern Ireland, host of the armed movement against London, to resource rich but poor areas back home.
Some of Indonesia’s areas rich in oil, gas and gold remain comparatively poor regarding nutrition, education, income and employment, leading to the stigma of being less capable citizens. Jakarta stands accused of sucking up too much of local revenue.
Then politicians add the toxic mix of ethnic and religious sentiment and things like “national interest”, loyalty to the “motherland”, a single “national identity”; and often this ends in war.
A rebellion in Aceh led to at least three generations experiencing violent conflict against Jakarta’s troops — and the devastating earthquake and tsunami of December 2004 was the windfall leading to the international Helsinki peace agreement 14 years ago on Aug. 15.
But it’s hard for some citizens to be happy for Acehnese — even less so for Timorese who are to mark the 20th anniversary of their Aug. 30, 1999 referendum that led to their independence. As the people in Aceh and free Timor Leste celebrate their courage of resistance, and commemorate the sacrifice of too many of their brethren, some Indonesians still snigger, “enjoy your independence/autonomy, poverty, corruption and infighting”, thinking they must be regretting separation from Jakarta.
The regional autonomy law was an historic breakthrough ending 32 years of centralistic rule, but far from enough.
President Jokowi came into power promising to address such regional injustices by “building from villages”, spending lavishly on infrastructure to improve nation-wide land, sea and air connectivity apart from chronic potholed roads.
Lawmakers in 2014 passed the Village Law, and researchers remind us that it’s not all about the village funds — it’s supposed to be another breakthrough to ensure villagers really have a say in decisions affecting their lives. Addressing regional disparity is part of our ongoing, back and forth, project of democracy. This is home; it needs constant repairs though many disagree how to go about it.
And because politics will always thrive on manipulation of sentiments and grievances, the ordinary citizen of the majority population could try better empathizing with “outer Java”.
This would require the ability of those in Java’s cities, mainly urbanites in the capital and surrounding areas, to at least be exposed to grievances beyond Java.
Certainly, this boils down to the capital-based media trying harder to cover far-flung areas, though facing low profit and tight competition.
A Philippines’ fellow journalist who was reporting from Mindanao in the rebellious south several years ago said one factor of the protracted conflict was that most coverage came from Manila-based media, with journalists parachuting in and out of the area populated by the nation’s Muslim minority.
That sounds so much like Indonesia’s problem. Lack of understanding and bias of journalists of the majority ethnic and religious groups perpetuate ignorance and stigma against people in remote areas. Despite all odds we in the media must try harder to expose voices, experiences and discomforts of far-flung citizens, including their daily blackouts.
The writer is a journalist at The Jakarta Post.