But expecting governments, the private sector and the public to come together to cut carbon emissions always seems like having a utopian conversation.
t is getting harder to ignore climate change these days. With floods ravaging cities from Germany to the United States and fires raging in forests from Greece to Australia, it has become an existential threat to humanity.
Scientists, who have continued to warn about the catastrophic impacts of the heating planet, now sound like doomsday prophets. Their empirical projections are now justified with frequent natural disasters that occur even in developed countries that have implemented strong mitigation.
But expecting governments, the private sector and the public to come together to cut carbon emissions always seems like having a utopian conversation.
And despite countries convening every year to address this issue – this year is the 26th UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) in the Scottish city of Glasgow – nothing, except for the pandemic in the past two years, has ever stopped the planet from hitting new temperature records.
At the very heart of the problem, regardless of all good intentions, is the notion that carbon emissions are the currency of economic growth, which has been the case since the Industrial Revolution in Europe in the 18th Century.
The trend continues today. Fossil fuel emissions from energy production, industrial processes and transportation remain the largest contributors of global emissions and large economies like China, the US, India, Russia and Japan are the biggest emitters.
And as countries recover from an economic recession caused by the pandemic, the appetite for fossil fuels is expected to rise because they are still the cheapest sources of energy.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.