TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Fair and unlovely: India confronts dark-skin bias

An Indian student is leading a campaign against whitening creams as global anti-racism protests highlight the obsession with fair complexions for many in Asia.

Glenda Kwek, with Ammu Kannampilly in Mumbai and Archana Thiyagarajan in Delhi (Agence France-Presse)
New Delhi, India
Fri, July 10, 2020

Share This Article

Change Size

Fair and unlovely: India confronts dark-skin bias This photo taken on July 8, 2020 shows packages of Unilever 'Fair and Lovely' skin-lightening creams on the counter of a shop in New Delhi. (AFP/Sajjad Hussain)

W

hen Chandana Hiran was a child, strangers would urge her to lighten her skin. Today the Indian student is leading a campaign against whitening creams as global anti-racism protests highlight the obsession with fair complexions for many in Asia.

The campaign achieved its first victory when cosmetics giant Unilever dropped the word "fair" from its popular Fair & Lovely skin-lightening cream. L'Oreal and Johnson & Johnson announced similar initiatives.

"They have been thriving on selling insecurities to women," 22-year-old Hiran, who launched an online petition against Fair & Lovely, told AFP.

"The narrative is that if you are dark-skinned, you cannot achieve anything in life. So being a dark-skinned girl I've always felt that maybe... I need to be fair. If I'm not, then maybe I don't deserve those things."

Multinationals have long profited from sales of whitening creams, face wash and even vaginal bleaching lotions, by advertising the message that beauty, success and love are only for pale-skinned people.

Unilever made $500 million from Fair & Lovely sales in India last year, according to Bloomberg.

Now, after mounting outrage sparked by the Black Lives Matter protests in Western cities, companies like Unilever say they "want to lead the celebration of a more diverse portrayal of beauty".

But campaigners warn their fight has just begun and that, without greater efforts to counter entrenched bias against darker skin, the rebranding remains superficial.

Read also: Unilever, rivals mull changes amid global backlash against skin-lightening products

Bias from birth

Colorism --  prejudice against darker skin tones -- in India is pervasive.

While British colonialism helped fuel colorism, the bias is deeply rooted in India's ancient caste hierarchies, experts say.

"The assumption is the higher castes are fairer than the lower castes," sociologist Suparna Kar of Bangalore's Christ University told AFP.

As a result, many associate pale skin with wealth and beauty -- a prejudice bolstered by Bollywood films which rarely make darker-complexioned women the star and frequently portray successful city-dwellers as fair-skinned.

Actress Tannishtha Chatterjee, long vocal about colorism, told AFP: "When I have been cast in urban roles, a make-up artist would come and tell me that it's an 'upmarket' role, so 'should I make the skin tone two shades lighter?'"

The bias begins at birth, said Kavitha Emmanuel, who visits schools promoting her "Dark is Beautiful" campaign launched in 2009.

"You'll hear, 'She's a girl and she's dark, oh my god, who is going to marry her? We have to ... make her look fair. Don't let her out in the sun, don't let her play sport'."

The prejudice shows up in school textbooks, she said, with a dark-skinned person used to denote "ugliness".

Many Indian women start using whitening products as children.

Seema, a 29-year-old domestic worker in New Delhi, has used Fair & Lovely since she was 14. Most of her female relatives use it -- including her 12-year-old daughter.

"When I look at the fairness-cream commercials it looks like a good product... they show that when people become fairer, they get jobs, they get proposals for marriage," she told AFP.

Indeed, newspaper adverts for arranged marriages regularly call for brides with "milky white" complexions.

The obsession is also widespread in Southeast Asia.

"Having a whiter skin is seen as... part of what is euphemistically called (a) 'pleasing personality'," University of the Philippines' medical anthropologist Gideon Lasco told AFP.

Read also: Johnson & Johnson drops skin-whitening creams

Profit and prejudice

Such prejudices have exposed generations to self-loathing and low self-esteem, experts say.

On top of the psychological damage, the products pose significant health risks.

Some contain hazardous levels of mercury, which can cause kidney damage, skin ailments and psychosis, the World Health Organization warns.

In Indonesia, the pursuit of "white skin" has led to the sale of toxic, unregulated products, prompting a government crackdown.

But activists say it will take time to alter such ingrained biases, especially when the sector is so profitable.

The skin-lightening industry is one of the world's fastest-growing beauty segments, and is forecast to be worth $31.2 billion by 2024, according to the WHO.

In India, a nation of 1.3 billion people, whitening products make up about half the skincare market.

"There's no letting society off the hook here," activist Kavita Krishnan told AFP.

Nevertheless, "corporate companies, commercial interests cannot simply use social bias as an alibi", she added.

But change is coming, said campaigner Emmanuel, who believes future generations will see the world -- and themselves -- differently.

Her recent visit to a school ended with a lighter-skinned student apologizing to classmates for bullying them over their darker complexions, Emmanuel said.

"For me, that was a moment... I realize it is having an impact."

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.