TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

How postcolonial is postcolonial Indonesia?

Why should we still talk about postcolonialism in this increasingly multipolar and interconnected world and in this industrial revolution 4

Vissia Ita Yulianto (The Jakarta Post)
Yogyakarta
Tue, August 20, 2019

Share This Article

Change Size

How postcolonial is postcolonial Indonesia?

W

span>Why should we still talk about postcolonialism in this increasingly multipolar and interconnected world and in this industrial revolution 4.0? What is its significance for 74-year-old Indonesia’s postcolonial society? Should we continue to orient the idea of a global history around one single rubric of European perspective by taking colonialism as the determining watershed?

While the notions of postcolonialism vary and should be understood as attempts to resonate hybrid freedom, we should criticize the continuity of the “inferiority complex” derived from the European colonial legacy in the Indonesian postcolonial scene.

As seen in colonialism, most European countries expressed deep racism socially as well as intellectually in order to foster Eurocentric ideas and colonial cultures.

So, it was only recently that a Jakarta-based scholar shared his personal experience when he was a PhD student in France some time ago. What troubles and concerns me is the way he introduced himself as coming from a “third world” country to his European colleagues.

For many, his way is common. There might be nothing problematic in his expression as this may be simply seen in terms of cultural communication or “politeness”, especially since he is there all alone in a foreign country. Anyone from any nationality who shared a colonial past may also introduce themselves this way.

The very reason why this story deserves special mention is that it was expressed by a member of the Indonesian intellectual elite who was supposed to have been aware of unjust power relations and the politics of representation. By accepting the concept of “third world”, he agrees and reinforces the idea that Western countries are solely responsible for knowledge production. Besides, the term third world is outdated as to describe the state of the bipolar moment back during the Cold War era.

The categorization of first, second and third worlds was coined by a French anthropologist, historian and demographer, Alfred Sauvy, in the early 1950s in his book L’Observateur to refer to countries unaligned with either the democratic United States (first world) or the communist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (second world) during the Cold War. These terms gained international acceptance and became commonplace.

Today, people use the terms to rank mainly the economic strength of countries in a neoliberal context. The notion of “third world” refers to undeveloped/underdeveloped or developing countries that still “lag behind” or are not yet quite developed like western countries. In this context, this should be considered a racist and neocolonial term, as seen by the fact that some of the so-called “third world” countries now have strong economic and democratic freedom.

However, despite this contemporary growth of democratic values and economy, the neo-liberal usage of the “third world” remains popular at every nook and corner of the world. As a result, it first and foremost has direct impacts to the way we see or not see the ideological, political and sociocultural dimensions of contemporary world order.

Second, it has implications as it becomes the underlying psychological predisposition, acting and influencing one’s behavior in a certain way, as social psychology expert Robert Gardner put it.

From a postcolonial perspective, such expression shows a highly complex and contested arena of feeling, thought and practice. Precisely, it shows the psychological operations of colonialist ideology, which left ex-colonies with a psychological inheritance of a negative self-image: a feeling of inferiority.

All the more so because neo-colonialism, with its transnational corporation’s hegemonic and prescriptive power, passes along, preserves and nourishes a global hierarchy in which current developed nations are naturally on top. Such feeling then decides the way we think, the way we believe, and the way we see as well as how we evaluate the world.

Today’s world’s geography invites us to remove the discourse of “postcolonial condition”, a state of transition and cultural instability, to be critical to the continuities of global imbalances. However, instead of moving beyond Eurocentric thought by raising public consciousness of the past and promoting a more liberated future, some, if not many, Indonesians are still deeply immersed in and resonate colonial and neo-colonial ideology.

____________________

The writer is a sociocultural anthropologist, researcher at the Center of Southeast Asian Social Studies and teaches Performing and Visual Arts Studies, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta.

{

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.