Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsCan't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultshe House of Representatives has enacted the Criminal Law Procedures Code (KUHAP) bill in a significant move by the government to overhaul the colonial-era framework on Indonesia's criminal procedures, despite widespread objections.
Beyond debates over the substance of the new KUHAP, the concept of "meaningful participation" has become a point of contention. While the House insists it conducted extensive public consultations in drafting the bill, civil society organizations dispute this and accuse the legislature of misrepresenting the extent of public involvement.
Amid strong criticism from civil society groups and as students protested outside the Senayan Legislative Complex, the House passed the bill into law during a plenary session on Tuesday, marking a milestone in the country's criminal justice system: Deliberations on the KUHAP bill had stretched on since 2012, across multiple administrations and through shifting political landscapes.
Fundamentally, the KUHAP serves as the procedural framework on how law enforcement authorities, from the police to prosecutors, may exercise their powers.
Law Minister Supratman Andi Agtas, who led the government's engagement with the bill, said the new KUHAP and the new Criminal Code (KUHP) would both go into effect on Jan. 2, 2026. The KUHP was enacted in January 2023 with a three-year transition period. Supratman emphasized that the government would use the remaining time to draft around 18 implementing regulations, including three government regulations (PP).
One of the most debated provisions in the new law is Article 74A, which formalizes the "peace agreement" as a form of restorative justice. This mechanism may be initiated between perpetrator and victim(s) as early as the investigation stage. Civil society groups warn that this provision opens the door to coercion and extortion.
Habiburokhman, who chairs House Commission III overseeing law enforcement, rejected claims that the mechanism could be weaponized. He explained that under articles 74A and 79, while a peace agreement could be established during the investigation phase even before the criminal act was formally determined, the process was tightly regulated and left no room for individuals to exploit it for financial gain.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.