In an 84-page submission to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), South Africa urged judges to order Israel to "immediately suspend its military operations" in Gaza.

South Africa alleges that Israel "has engaged in, is engaging in, and risks further engaging in genocidal acts against the Palestinian people in Gaza".

Israel has angrily hit back at the accusations, with government spokesman Eylon Levy vowing to fight the South African case he described as "blood libel".

"No, South Africa, it is not we who have come to perpetrate genocide, it is Hamas," said Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Top officials from the two countries will face off in the ICJ's Great Hall of Justice housed in the extravagant Peace Palace in The Hague – a world away from the death and destruction seen recently in Gaza and Israel.

In response to the attack by Hamas militants on Oct. 7, Israel has reduced large parts of the Gaza Strip to rubble with its bombing campaign.

The Hamas attack resulted in the deaths of around 1,140 people, while Israel's military campaign has killed at least 22,722, according to official figures. The UN estimates 1.9 million Gazans are displaced, with fears growing of famine and disease.

The ICJ rules on disputes between states and its decisions are legally binding.

The court could in theory order Israel to stop its invasion but it is highly doubtful Tel Aviv would obey.

In March 2022, the ICJ ordered Russia to "immediately suspend" its invasion of Ukraine – a directive Moscow has ignored.

Johann Soufi, a lawyer and international justice expert, told AFP there would be an "extremely significant symbolic impact" if the court ruled against Israel.

"Of course there is the problem of implementing the decision. But at the end of the day, international justice is all there is left," said Soufi, who worked for the UN agency for Palestinian refugees in Gaza.

 

'Criminally complicit'

South Africa has filed the case against Israel because both countries have signed the UN Genocide Convention, created in 1948 as a response to the Holocaust.

Any country that has signed the convention can sue another at the ICJ if they disagree on the "interpretation, application or fulfillment" of the rules designed to prevent genocide.

South Africa said it was "acutely aware of the particular weight of responsibility in initiating proceedings against Israel for violations of the Genocide Convention".

It also "unequivocally" condemned the Hamas attack but said "no armed attack... no matter how serious... can provide any possible justification for breaches" of the Genocide Convention.

Pretoria's case is that Israeli action in Gaza is "intended to bring about the destruction of a substantial part of the Palestinian national, racial and ethnic group".

It says Israel's "genocidal acts" stem from the killing of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza, forced displacement, and preventing adequate aid access, resulting in starvation.

South Africa wants the ICJ to impose so-called "provisional measures", or emergency actions, while the broader case is being considered – which would probably take years.

"The circumstances could not be more urgent," argues Pretoria, describing an "exceptionally brutal military campaign by Israel in Gaza, which is extensive and ongoing".

Other measures requested by South Africa include reparations and reconstruction of Gaza, plus the safe return of displaced Palestinian refugees.

The case has been dismissed in the West as "meritless, counterproductive and completely without any basis in fact whatsoever".

Levy, the Israeli government spokesman, claims South Africa was giving "political and legal cover" to the Hamas attacks and was "criminally complicit with Hamas's campaign of genocide against our people".

"History will judge South Africa for abetting the modern heirs of the Nazis," Levy complained.