Rita Sastrawan , Paris | Wed, 11/05/2008 10:32 AM | Opinion
The establishment of oil-palm plantations in Kalimantan and Sumatra poses the greatest threat to orangutans today. In fact, the clearing of forest and the establishment of oil-palm plantations has a negative impact not only on orangutan populations but also on climate, the water cycle, carbon emissions and livelihoods in local communities.
Although many people are aware of these facts, oppose the development of biofuels from palm oil and oppose the creation of these plantations, the destruction of the rainforest continues.
The effects of land-clearing are simple and obvious once you have seen it with your own eyes. It is even easier when you witness the rescue of orangutans or experience breathing difficulties and stinging eyes from the smoke of burning forest and peat.
When we consume destructive palm oil in crispy chips or delicious chocolate, or wash our hands with sweetly fragranced soap, we are very rarely conscious of the adverse effects our activities incur. Because we don't feel the negative impacts firsthand we can't imagine the way our behavior influences nature and the lives of people on a faraway island. Meanwhile the destructive oil business continues and the market keeps growing.
Unilever is one of the biggest palm oil consumers worldwide using 1.3 metric tons every year. Its heart-shaped ice cream brand under many names and numerous other brands -- Dove, Sunsilk, Omo, Knorr, Blue Band, Becel, Best Foods, Ben & Jerry's and Findus -- are only a few of the many Unilever companies.
Avoiding products which may contain palm oil is nearly impossible, but as consumers we can all try to do what we can. Many consumers have made an effort to avoid products containing palm oil, and Unilever has been forced to respond, promising improvement by way of ensuring the palm oil they use is "sustainably" produced.
But where should all this sustainable palm oil come from? As worldwide demand for palm oil is so high, it can't be met with only the sustainably grown version simply because not enough is available.
With limited supplies of certified sustainable palm oil only now entering the market, Unilever has had to buy unsustainable palm oil from many companies, one of which is Wilmar Group, one of the biggest palm-oil trading companies in the world, handling at least a quarter of all global palm-oil output. Besides supplying Unilever with palm oil, Nestl* and Cargill are also among Wilmar's customers.
Not only are we eating palm oil, washing our clothes and ourselves with it, driving cars and producing electricity fueled by it, but our savings are often invested in banks connected with this biofuel that is helping destroy the planet. Among Wilmar's financiers are Rabobank, ABM Amro, Standard Chartered, Citibank, IFC of the World Bank, OCBC, Fortis and ING.
Just as Unilever has many brands which we might assume are independent local companies, Wilmar International also owns plantations under different company names and buys palm oil from family-related companies as well, such as from the Indonesian Ganda Group. Wilmar's plantations are situated in Kalimantan, Malaysia, Sumatra and Uganda. Their plantations cover nearly 600,000 hectares, and are proposed to grow to up to 1 million hectares, an area as large as South Korea. Two-thirds of these lands still must be cleared of forest and planted with palms.
Forest where orangutans were known to live have been cleared illegally. Plantations were established without official permission or environmental impact assessments. After immense pressure by NGOs, Wilmar International admitted in February 2008 it had violated its own plantation development policies in Indonesia.
Since Wilmar is planning to set up plantations in Central Kalimantan in Borneo, large-scale forest destruction and burning awaits that region. With the merging of PPB Palm Oil and Wilmar International, Wilmar now has 16 subsidiaries in Central Kalimantan. Most of the approximately 250,000 hectares have still not been developed. Another 250,000 hectares in Central Kalimantan are allocated for other companies' plantations; concessions covering one million hectares in all have already been handed out.
Existing forest should be protected from more onslaughts and oil-palm entrepreneurs should be forbidden to clear further. This and other steps are laid out in the Indonesian "Oranguatan Conservation Strategy and Action Plan", which should be enforced and implemented.
"To save orangutans, we must save the forests," the Indonesian President said in December 2007.
That is quite true, but implementation looks quite different. Companies are still cutting down forest and setting fire to peatlands as the cheapest and quickest method to clear new ground for yet more oil-palm plantations.
We see a nightmare relentlessly approaching. The forests will burn and orangutans will have to flee or die of hunger. Borneo is a hotspot of endemic plants and animals, hosting creatures most people haven't seen in their lives and natural medicines (which the resident Dayak people know well and use), but Borneo is also a hotspot for destruction, suffering and death.
Let your voice be heard. We as consumers are driving the market. Because of our consumption, companies make a profit from rainforest destruction.
Be concerned about your consumer behavior and show your concern by writing to companies. Help us save what is left!
The writer is International Communications Coordinator for Borneo Orangutan Survival International). She can be reached at rita@bos-international.org
Bodong (not verified) — Fri, 12/19/2008 - 8:20am
as I know:
There are strict competition between palm oil vs soy and rapeseed oil. Soy and rapeseed use land 5 times larger and every 3-4 month the land must be cleared. but Oil palm just cleared once, and will leave for 25 years. Total area cultivated by soy in US ca. 90 million ha, since oil palm in Indonesia just 6,7 million ha... why US NGO's do not respect for 90 m ha in front of their eye? and why Cargil and his friends also play in Indonesian Palm Oil? In Aussie, there are dessert everywhere.... why is NGO not greening that dessert, and why Austindo Group destroy forest in Indonesia?
The history told me: colonialism and capitalism have destroy developing countries....and now, the grand children of colonial will invade again by environmental issues that they know nothing about it (please go out from the library/his story).....
I know who's the real and actual environmentalist in orangutan conservation.... they never blame others, but they do the real thing to help orangutan and people around orangutan "orangdisekitarorangutan"....
Yoko (not verified) — Thu, 11/20/2008 - 11:40am
Opening new palm oil plantation means million of jobs creations for the people of indonesia.
Historically speaking, you have at least 100 years of palm oil plantation already and keep going.
The article never frame the question in the social-economy context of Indonesia as a developing nation with high unemployment.
To me it is very clear who should i side with : orang-utan or orang indonesia, "starving me and my family today" or "the fate of my future generation and their environment" -whatever that means.
Jo (not verified) — Wed, 11/12/2008 - 10:03am
This is a very good article. But it only lists brands that we should NOT consume and thereby support. How about a list of brands that we SHOULD support? I think that would be easier to remember for everyone and a more positive approach: Not blaming and shaming but rewarding good behaviour. Might be interesting also to publish such a list to reward companies which are consciously staying out of palm oil use and make good PR for them!
Kevin f (not verified) — Mon, 11/10/2008 - 9:53am
how about WHO IS DESTROYING YOUR COUNTRY?!?
greed! yes
Rick Christian (not verified) — Mon, 11/10/2008 - 7:47am
Thank you for the article. It's so important that this message is spread far and wide. The only way this is going to stop is if we can put pressure on companies using these products to change the way they do things.
It's also great to see so many NGOs and not for profits getting involved to try and help save Orangutan Habitat. Australian not for profit, Rainforest Rescue, is supporting projects to help save the Orangutan through it's "Orangutan Habitat for Survival" project - for more information, visit http://www.rainforestrescue.org.au/ourprojects/save-a-rainforest-orangut...
Jaka (not verified) — Thu, 11/06/2008 - 5:31pm
Why nobody does not pay attention to Indonesian other oil resources: waste of fruit? Tons of seeds from fruit industry and market are wasted everyday, yet nobody realize that many fruit seeds contain oil as alternative source.
It may not possible to stop forest conversion to plantation at all but by reducing demand of oil by diversifying its sources, we can at least reach a reasonable rate of consumption.
Jeanne Pickering (not verified) — Thu, 11/06/2008 - 2:02pm
I am helping the best way I can via the Orangutan Project in Perth Western Australia. I am writing and telephoning companies responsible for using palm oil and using animals in their barbaric testing for the products we all use. The company Lush is stopping using palm oil at the beginning of next year now that they are aware of the damage it is doing. I have been in touch with the manufacturers of Lush products and have started using them (they are fantastic) believing what they say about not using palm oil within the next month or so. I encourage all people to help them achieve their goal and other companies who are stopping using palm oil. Having just returned from Borneo for a short holiday and seeing these beautiful creatures, we really must do all in our power to save them. Please everyone, do your best, we can make a difference.
Dean (not verified) — Thu, 11/06/2008 - 1:28pm
Maybe people ought to be also considering that many banks are giving low interest rate loans under Clean Development programs to develop palm oil plantations. There are conflicting opinions of what constitutes 'green development'.
Bart W van Assen (not verified) — Thu, 11/06/2008 - 10:46am
Keeping in mind that actions speak louder than words, I’m surprised that the “action” this article proposes is but more words (writing to companies). Not only that, the article lacks to provide info on whom to write to, but only hints at Unilever and Wilmar. Will writing to these companies be very effective in changing the world's need of oil palm?
If we look at the actions taken by both Unilever and Wilmar, one must admit that both are leading the improvement of Indonesia’s oil palm sector. Both are long-time members of the Round-table on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), and have donated valuable resources to develop this initiative. Wilmar has gone far beyond any of the current (inter)national requirements by identifying large tracts of natural areas that are to be conserved.
One could argue that these improvements are reactions to the pressures from NGOs worldwide. For instance, Greenpeace was going ape at Unilever not long ago (see also http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/blog/climate/unilever-takes-the-lead-to-sto...). Friends of the Earth International pressured Wilmar into better practices (see for instance www.foeeurope.org/publications/2007/Wilmar_Palm_Oil_Environmental_Social...). But, ultimately his pressure was funded by (western) constituents, either through their tax money or their membership fees of NGOs.
Instead of more words, why not propose some (practical) actions that JP readers can take? For instance, reducing our dependence on oil palm through alternative products. Or by boycotting products produced by laggards (instead of the leaders) in the oil palm industry. Or by donating money to NGOs that have successfully pressured industries towards more responsible behavior. At the very least, provide names and contact data for people to contact about making a change...
Warm regards,
Bart