Mon, 11/10/2008 11:16 AM | Opinion
The Amrozi Circus has left town. The three terrorists most responsible for the carnage in Bali in October 2002 have finally been executed after months of uncertainty that turned the waiting into a public spectacle that only upset and infuriated relatives of the victims and prolonged their pain.
Imam Samudra and brothers Amrozi Nurhasyim and Ali Ghufron were executed by a firing squad not far from their Nusakambangan Island high security prison in Central Java. Even until their last moments, they never publicly expressed remorse for planning and executing the bomb attacks on two discos in Bali that left more than 200 people dead, mostly foreign tourists, more than six years ago.
Even as they stared death in the face, the terrorists still bragged of their imminent executions as an act of martyrdom. Now with their deaths, they get half of what they wished for. Since they never believed in the man-made judiciary, they have to deal with God's law. Now they have to answer for themselves, without the aid of lawyers, for their heinous and brutal crime.
All these years, instead of remorse, the public was given a sickening display of how these three men made a mockery of the Indonesian judiciary and the legal process they were going through, every step of the way.
There was the constant shouting of "Allahu Akbar" (God is Great) in the Bali courthouse as they were being tried; there was the intimidation of witnesses and relatives of the foreign victims who came all the way to see that justice was being done; and there was the theatrical behavior that turned their trial into a farce. Adding insult to injury, there was Amrozi's famous broad smile as the court sentenced him to death, earning him the nickname "The Smiling Bomber" in the Australian press.
Even on death row, they continued to make news, obviously aided by the prison authorities. There were the media interviews they gave, always using the opportunity to justify their acts in the name of Islam and not for once showing any sign of regret; one of them even got married while on death row; and they were constantly in contact with the outside world with easy access to telephones and the Internet. So much for Indonesia's high security prison system.
The media, particularly television, seemed to be a willing partner throughout this whole spectacle, especially during the last four weeks while the authorities hesitated in carrying out the execution order.
Almost every day for the past month Amrozi and friends received extensive media coverage normally reserved for celebrities facing marital problems or sex scandals. They have in fact become instant celebrities in their own right. Only in Indonesia can a convicted terrorist awaiting execution become a media darling.
Now that they have been executed, we hope there will be some soul-searching by those who run our prisons about the concept of high security prisons, and by those who run the national media about their complicity, deliberate or not, in this whole fiasco.
Many people in this country and outside oppose the death penalty, so it came as no surprise that some of the 11th hour appeals to spare the lives of Amrozi and friends came from the relatives of the victims in Australia.
Perhaps they can make an exception just this once. If humanity is the ground for rejecting capital punishment, there is almost nothing human about these three men. If evil had a face, theirs are samples of it.
Good riddance. The world is so much better without them. The pain and suffering they have caused many people all these years can only begin to heal now.
Gede Seputra (not verified) — Wed, 11/12/2008 - 6:20pm
You might be surprised, "Sandfly", when you say:
"What a shame that few Australians will read this editorial."
I believe many will (and have done so already). Maybe not enough.
Like you, I am very impressed by this excellent Editorial and applaud the author. Well done! It shows, if nothing else, that there are still intelligent and vocal people in Indonesia. So - there's still "hope".
Crispen Waugh (not verified) — Tue, 11/11/2008 - 9:23am
Send in the clowns.
Ironic.
After the Amrozi circus, it's time for the media circus. And high at the top of the program guide or newspaper are the stars of the show: the clowns. Send them in. Roll out the editors and their opinions.
The moralizing, holier-than-thou attitude has really become quite grating of late. Doubly ironic for a profession supposedly dedicated to publishing the truth, but in modern times has no qualms or reservations about bending, shaping, replacing and substituting that precious commodity whenever the clowns see fit.
If Amrozi et al were truly guilty of the heinous crime, then they received their just deserts. But in these days of misinformation, torture, forced confessions, white masters who must be appeased and a host of conspiracy theories terrifyingly becoming facts, anything is possible and nothing is new under the sun.
But, no worries mate! We have the 'independent' media as our moral watchdog. To gloss over and present fact as fiction, good as bad and vice versa.
I just wish these whiteys would go back and write their editorials in their own countries where preaching to the converted is the norm. Leave us alone. We have plenty of clowns in Nusantera to keep us distracted.
Don't bother, they're here.
S.Kenny (not verified) — Tue, 11/11/2008 - 7:33am
I disagree. As heinous as their crimes were, the death penalty was still an inappropriate option, and the Australian Government should have put more international pressure on the Indonesian Government to prevent the executions.
Their deaths have forever immortalised them as martyrs to a dysfunctional cause that is tearing the Islamic world apart. How the death penalty could ever be seen as a deterrent to men who willingly kill themselves in the name of religion seems rather mysterious. It has, in fact, given a false sense of poeticism and heroism to their characters, and allowed them to leave the world without the forty or fifty or sixty years of suffering and potential rehabilitation that a life sentence might have given them.
The world is not better off without them. It would be better off with them locked away and forgotten about, growing old and decrepid and influentially impotent.
No wonder Amrozi was smiling when sentenced. He figures himself to be a self-styled martyr, and unfortunately he is not alone.
The death penalty is inappropriate, but especially so in cases as politically and religiously charged as this one.
Kekrur (not verified) — Mon, 11/10/2008 - 4:30pm
It never ceased to amaze me how these 3 were allowed by authorities to get their messages of venom and hate to the media...Print and more particularly T.V. Also the discipline of some of the prison personnel. What I found sickening was vision of some official with an arm around Amrozi, laughing with him at prayers. A picture of friendship $ support?
I am an agnostic, and I fail to see how any body's God, or any believer can condone their barbaric act.
Shooting them was not an answer. locking them away for life with minimal contact to other human beings, and for them hopefully to contemplate their beliefs and susequent act, but definetly not allowing them or any other incarcerated individuals a voice to express their opinions or threats or innocence thru the media be that printed or visual.
I do whole heartedly agree that the vision of the trial was more like a "Three Ringed Circus" than a court of Justice. ( Corby trial was similar).
It does raise argument of allowing media (TV camera) direct access to Trials, where accused can use the trial procedure as they're pipeline to supporters / public. It gives the impression of little or no control of the proceedings and belittles the seriousness of the procedures
Allowing any message, print or other media to be shown, is in my eyes a criminal act as well!
Andre VanderHeyden (not verified) — Mon, 11/10/2008 - 3:49pm
Well said!
Rod from sydney (not verified) — Mon, 11/10/2008 - 2:51pm
Well said mate.
I hope they rot in hell for what they have done. I am not a fan of the death penalty, but in the case of mass murder it should be the death penalty. These three were the worst your society has to offer and the way they conducted themselves in court was a disgrace. Your media has alot to answer for giving them a voice.
Hopefully there families never get bombed like they were so willing to kill many hundreds of people, all of whom they have never met. ''God is great'' is what these people said going to there graves, if god does exist, I wonder what he said to these three when they showed up there ?
Rod.
Sandfly (not verified) — Mon, 11/10/2008 - 2:35pm
What a shame that few Australians will read this editorial. We used to be just as direct, and largely still are, but our voice has been blunted by the complacency that comes with wealth. The triumph of 'those who know what's best for us', is everywhere to be seen: so we get the predictable agonies about capital punishment instead of the relief that comes from your recognition of shared humanity.
I could have forgiven those who committed their inhuman acts if they had reflected and shown a scintilla of remorse but they chose not to. I still cannot understand how any cause could be worth the indiscriminate slaughter which those misguided souls caused.
Thankfully, your editorial cut through the cant and said things which our press would never consider these days. We obviously have so much more in common than geographical location. I don't know how we do it but I'm certain that we need more informal contact between our nations at the grass-root level.