Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post
The Jakarta Post
Video Weather icon 30°C
DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
weather-icon
30°C Partly Cloudy

Dry and mostly cloudy throughout the day.

  • weather-icon

    Wed

    26℃ - 32℃

  • weather-icon

    Thu

    25℃ - 32℃

  • weather-icon

    Fri

    25℃ - 31℃

  • weather-icon

    Sat

    26℃ - 30℃

Giant Sea Wall urgent to save sinking Jakarta: Consultant

  • Corry Elyda

    The Jakarta Post

Jakarta | Thu, October 8, 2015 | 06:21 pm

A water management specialist from Dutch research institute Deltares has confirmed that the National Capital Integrated Coastal Development (NCICD) project, known as the Giant Sea Wall (GSW), will have an environmental impact, but says that land subsidence in Jakarta is a far greater threat and the wall is one of the solutions.

Jan Jaap Brinkman said on Wednesday that the project might affect the Thousand Islands as well as erosion patterns, coral reefs and biota.

However, Brinkman argued that the project was an urgent measure to protect four to five million people threatened by land subsidence that would see their current homes 4 to 9 meters below sea level.

'€œEverybody keeps forgetting and ignoring the land subsidence, this is the driving force,'€ he said.

Jakarta is sinking an average of 5 to 20 centimeters per year, with an average of about 7.5 cm per year.

Brinkman added that if the land subsidence continued like this, by the end of the century Jakarta would have sunk another 5 to 6 meters.

Brinkman said the '€œcheapest and easiest'€ solution to land subsidence is to stop groundwater extraction. Millions of households, offices, and industries rely on groundwater as the coverage of tap water is only about 60 percent.

'€œHowever, if the sinking does not stop, Jakarta has only two options to protect its people,'€ he said.

He went on to say that they comprised evacuating millions of people and buildings from northern Jakarta to higher ground or enclosing Jakarta Bay with a '€œgood, very safe dike, good very large pumps and a very large lake to store the water: the giant sea wall'€.

Recently, the Research and Development for Marine and Coastal Resources Department at the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Ministry showed that the giant sea wall would have large environmental and social costs, including the disappearance of islands and the damage of biota in the sea. The ministry'€™s study claimed that it would also destroy the biota in the water inside the wall because of eutrophication process from the pollution of Jakarta'€™s 13 rivers, and displace thousands of fishermen.

The study was conducted by more than a dozen researchers in 2014 by making a simulation of the GSW. The result was published as a book, Dinamika Teluk Jakarta; Analisis Prediksi Dampak Pembangunan Tanggul Laut Jakarta (The Dynamics of Jakarta Bay; Prediction Analysis of the effects of the Giant Sea Wall Construction), by IPB Press.

Separately, the Office of the Coordinating Economic Minister'€™s assistant deputy for water resource infrastructure, Mohammad Zainal Fatah, said that he doubted GSW would cause great environmental damage, saying that it would instead have many positive effects.

'€œThe project is urgent as North Jakarta is sinking,'€ he said.

Regarding the potential for eutrophication, Zaenal said the wall would not be designed like a big sewage pond.

'€œWe will have a water treatment plant that can provide a raw water supply,'€ he said.

He added that the central government and the city administration were now speeding up construction plans of the liquid waste treatment system.

'€œWe previously aimed to complete the project by 2050 but we are trying to finish it by 2022,'€ he said.

Separately, Jakarta Development Planning Board (Bappeda) Tuty Kusumawati said that the city administration and other entities would try to minimize the impact of the project on the fisherfolk.

'€œWe will try to alter their profession from fisherfolk to fish farmers,'€ she said.

Comments