TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsProblem of dualism: Graft vs public finances
For almost one and a half decades, reforms of the state’s financial management have been gradually carried out.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
A handcuffed man offering bribe. (Shutterstock/File)
C
orruption is a major challenge for Indonesia in realizing its objective of creating a just and prosperous society. It undermines the capacity of the country to implement development programs, reduces public trust in the state and is the reason for ineffective implementation of government programs.
Corruption also affects the quality of policies issued by the government, which in turn affects government efforts to improve the welfare of the people. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to ensure measures to eradicate corruption.
Theoretically, corruption can be eliminated through a preventive approach by reforming public financial management. Good financial management with a credible and adequate control system is expected to be able to minimize the risk of corrupt practices in public institutions.
For almost one and a half decades, reforms of the state’s financial management have been gradually carried out, such as through the issuance of the State Finance Law in 2003, the State Treasury Law and State Financial Management and Accountability Audit Law in 2004.
