TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

UN slams Facebook decision on Ukraine violent messages

The policy decision from Facebook and Instagram's parent company Meta on Thursday said the platforms would now allow statements like "death to Russian invaders" but not credible threats against civilians.

News Desk (AFP)
Geneva, Switzerland
Sun, March 13, 2022

Share This Article

Change Size

 UN slams Facebook decision on Ukraine violent messages Facebook, Whatsapp and Instagram logos are displayed through broken glass in this illustration taken October 4, 2021. (Reuters/Dado Ruvic/Illustration)

T

he UN voiced alarm Friday at Facebook's decision to temporarily ease its policy on violent speech after Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, warning it could spark "hate speech" against Russians.

The policy decision from Facebook and Instagram's parent company Meta on Thursday said the platforms would now allow statements like "death to Russian invaders" but not credible threats against civilians.

"This is clearly a very, very complex issue, but it does raise some concerns under the terms of human rights law and international humanitarian law," UN rights office spokeswoman Elizabeth Throssell told reporters in Geneva.

In its statement Thursday, the firm pointed to the Russian invasion of Ukraine that began on February 24.

"We have temporarily made allowances for forms of political expression that would normally violate our rules like violent speech such as 'death to the Russian invaders'," it said. 

It added that it "still won't allow credible calls for violence against Russian civilians". 

Throssell warned that the new policy lacked clarity, which "could certainly contribute to hate speech directed at Russians in general".

"That would be really concerning," she said, adding that the UN rights office planned to raise its concerns with Meta.

"We may encourage them to look at certain harms that come with this change of policy," she said.

Throssell acknowledged that the issue was legally complex and freedom of speech concerns also needed to be considered.

"In an ongoing conflict, seeking violence against those who are directly engaged in hostilities would likely not be prohibited speech," she said.

"This needs more analysis from our side, and also more information from Meta."

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.