TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Ruling against journalist sparks concern over press freedom: Activists
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Members of the Corruption Eradication People’s Committee rally outside the State Palace on Jan. 8, 2019, to demand that the government abolish articles in the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law, which they deemed to be a threat to freedom of expression. (JP/Seto Wardhana)
A
recent ruling against South Sulawesi-based journalist Muhammad Asrul, who was charged under the defamation article of the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law, has sparked concern among civil groups over press freedom in the country.
Asrul was sentenced by the Palopo District Court in South Sulawesi on Nov. 23 to three months in jail for three articles that he wrote about a graft case allegedly involving Farid Kasim Judas, the son of the Palopo mayor, which were published on the online media outlet berita.news in May 2019.
Abdul Aziz Dumpa of the Makassar Legal Aid Institute (LBH Makassar), Asrul’s legal representative, told The Jakarta Post on Tuesday that an appeal had been lodged against the ruling. He added that the appeal was primarily based on the fact that Asrul’s articles were considered journalistic works, meaning that any disputes arising from the articles should be settled through the Press Council.
The Press Council declared on March 4, 2020, that Asrul’s articles fell within the category of a journalistic product and, therefore, recommended that the case be settled through the council, as mandated by the 1999 Press Law.
Alliance of Independent Journalists (AJI) head Sasmito Madrim said the court’s ruling had set “a bad precedent” and threatened press freedom, particularly as it ignored provisions set in the Press Law, adding that journalists should not be prosecuted for their work.
Read also: Govt to table proposed changes to draconian cyberlaw soon
“Law enforcement officials did not understand and ignore the 1999 Press Law because if we refer to the law, disputes from news coverage should be settled by the Press Council,” Sasmito said, adding that the provision had been reaffirmed in a memorandum of understanding (MoU) between the National Police and the Press Council.
