Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsCan't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsThe recent Constitutional Court ruling that upholds direct regional head elections has been met with divisive reactions from political parties in the House of Representatives, with those pushing for an indirect election giving no assurance that they would drop their campaign.
he recent court ruling that upholds direct regional head elections has been met with divisive reactions from political parties, with those pushing for an indirect poll giving no assurance that they would drop their campaign to return to the old system in place during the authoritarian New Order regime.
Last Thursday, in its judicial opinion issued as part of a ruling on the minimum votes for candidates to win regional elections, the Constitutional Court said governors, mayors and regents are elected directly by people every five years, just like in the presidential and legislative elections.
The ruling came on the heels of growing efforts by politicians from pro-government political parties in recent months to scrap direct regional elections to cut costs, in favor of having governors, regents and mayors be appointed by regional legislatures (DPRDs) at the provincial and municipal or regental level instead.
Direct elections have been in place since 2005 as part of the reform and decentralization process instituted after the 1998 fall of the New Order regime under the country’s longtime leader, Soeharto, former father-in-law of President Prabowo Subianto.
Critics say that the proposal to abolish direct elections will undermine the country’s hard-won democratic progress and push the country toward a semi-authoritarian state.
But proponents of indirect elections, such as pro-government Golkar Party and the National Awakening Party (PKB), continue to show their support for the old system even though they are still discussing internally whether or not to change their stance following the court ruling amid a plan to revise the election law in the House of Representatives.
“Regional autonomy lies in the regencies and cities, whereas provincial administrations are simply an extension of the central government,” Golkar deputy chair Ahmad Doli Kurnia told The Jakarta Post on Monday. “Thus, their election models should differ.”
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.