TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

'Blurred Lines' legal saga ends in $5 million ruling favoring Marvin Gaye family

A copyright dispute over the smash hit "Blurred Lines" has ended with the family of Motown legend Marvin Gaye winning a nearly $5 million judgment against Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams.

News Desk (Agence France-Presse)
Los Angeles, United States
Fri, December 14, 2018

Share This Article

Change Size

'Blurred Lines' legal saga ends in $5 million ruling favoring Marvin Gaye family US rapper Pharrell Williams attends the City of Hope Gala 2018 in Santa Monica, California, on October 11, 2018. (AFP/Lisa O'Connor)

A

long-running copyright dispute over the smash hit "Blurred Lines" has ended with the family of Motown legend Marvin Gaye winning a nearly $5 million judgment against Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams.

Thicke and Williams had been accused by Gaye's estate of copyright infringement for their 2013 hit because of similarities with the late singer's "Got to Give It Up".

In 2015, the estate was awarded more than $7 million but the amount was later reduced to $5.3 million

Thicke and Pharrell appealed that judgment and a California judge earlier this year overall upheld the jury's decision.

In a December 6 final ruling in the case made public on Thursday, US District Judge John Kronstadt ordered Thicke, Williams and Williams' publishing company to pay Gaye's estate $2.9 million in damages, US media reported.

Thicke was ordered to pay an additional $1.76 million. Williams and his publishing company must also separately pay Gay's estate nearly $360,000.

Gaye's family was also rewarded 50 percent of the song's royalties.

Read also: Appeal seeks to overturn 'Blurred Lines' copyright verdict

The verdict caps a long-drawn legal battle that was closely watched by the music industry.

The initial award in the case had triggered an angry response from many songwriters, who argued that there were major differences between the two songs at the center of the legal battle, including the melodies and lyrics.

Williams, a popular songwriter who had another smash hit with "Happy," said in an interview in 2015 that all creative people had inspirations.

"The verdict handicaps any creator out there who is making something that might be inspired by something else," he said at the time.

"If we lose our freedom to be inspired, we're going to look up one day and the entertainment industry as we know it will be frozen in litigation."

Representatives of both Williams and Thicke could not be immediately reached for comment.

{

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.