Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsCan't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsAny decent nation should condemn any act of aggression by one country against another as a matter of principle, if anything else, but Indonesia opted not to do that both when the US attacked Venezuela and when Russia invaded Ukraine.
Regime change: United States President Donald Trump (second right), alongside Deputy Chief of Staff (left) Stephen Miller, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio (second left) and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, speaks to the press on Jan. 03, following US military actions in Venezuela, at his Mar-a-Lago residence in Palm Beach, Florida, the US. (AFP/Jim Watson)
e are disheartened to find our government failing to take a stronger stance in reacting to the United States’ bombing of Caracas and the kidnapping of Venezuela's President Nicolás Maduro with his wife, then flying them to New York to face drug trafficking charges.
It is not the first time that Jakarta has shied away from outrightly condemning what is clearly an act of aggression by one country against another in violation of international laws. Instead, the Foreign Ministry in the statement on Sunday went only as far as “expressing deep concerns”.
We recall the government gave a similar meek response when Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, they expressed concerns and called for peace, but fell short of condemning the act. Only a week later in March, at the United Nations General Assembly did Indonesia vote for the resolution deploring the invasion and demanding the full withdrawal of Russian forces.
True, four years later, Russian forces are still in Ukraine, which raises the question: does condemning an act of aggression by a big power change anything on the ground? The answer may be no, and therefore the same argument could apply today whether condemning the US attack on Venezuela would have any impact.
But any decent nation should condemn any act of aggression by one country against another as a matter of principle, if anything else. That principle is respecting the sovereign rights of other nations and abiding by all international laws. If you violate that principle, then all hell break loose.
A condemnation is a good starting point to try to roll back the invasion, to discourage future aggression and open diplomatic channels to resolve whatever problems the warring countries may have as an alternative to the use of military force.
Let us hope the government takes a stronger position if and when the UNGA comes up with a resolution to deplore the US. We should be less calculating about the costs and benefits of our relations with big powers and be more principled in our response.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.