Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsCan't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsThe decision of the Cantonal Court of Zug, Switzerland, in the case brought by Pari residents against Holcim marks a significant milestone in the development of global climate litigation.
he climate crisis is often discussed in distant terms, targets, percentages and long-term projections. Yet for many communities, especially those living on small islands, the crisis is neither abstract nor something that will happen in the future. It is immediate and urgent. Homes are lost, livelihoods disappear, and living spaces slowly sink due to rising sea levels. Despite this reality, small islands and their communities remain largely marginalized in mainstream climate discussions.
Indonesia's smaller islands offer a clear example of this climate injustice, many of them face an existential threat from sea level rises, coastal erosion and increasingly frequent tidal flooding. At the same time, these territories are burdened by extractive industries that further erode their environmental carrying capacity.
WALHI data (2025) records at least 248 mining permits operating on 43 small islands across Indonesia. The impacts have been severe: deforestation, marine pollution and a drastic decline in the number of fishers over the past decade. The Constitutional Court and Supreme Court have even classified extractive activities on small islands as abnormally dangerous activities.
Without fundamental policy change, thousands of coastal villages and outermost small islands face the risk of submergence. This situation will not only accelerate ecological degradation but also generate growing numbers of climate refugees, deepening Indonesia’s social and environmental crisis.
These conditions are experienced firsthand by the residents of Pari Island in the Thousand Islands regency, Jakarta. The island has lost approximately seven to 10 meters of land each year due to coastal erosion. Tidal flooding has become a recurring event that disrupts daily life. In 2020, for the first time, Pari experienced tidal flooding twice in a single year. Not only did the frequency increase, but the impacts were also severer than in previous years.
Confronted with the threat of losing their island, Pari residents took an extraordinary step. In 2022, four residents filed a lawsuit against the Holcim Group in a Swiss court. The lawsuit is grounded in a core principle of climate justice: those who contribute the most to the climate crisis must be held accountable for the harm it causes.
The decision of the Cantonal Court of Zug, Switzerland, in the case brought by Pari residents against Holcim marks a significant milestone in the development of global climate litigation. By rejecting all procedural objections raised by Holcim and allowing the case to proceed to substantive examination, the court affirmed that the climate crisis is not merely a matter of public policy, but a legal issue that can and must be adjudicated.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.