TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsAnalysis: Fear of misuse looms as new Criminal Code takes effect
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Illustration of a Criminal Code (KUHP) book next to a gavel and a Lady Justice statue. (Shutterstock/ La Terase)
A
fter decades of relying on Dutch colonial regulations, Indonesia finally has its own Criminal Code (KUHP), which came into effect on Jan. 2. While the government claims the new KUHP reflects modern legal standards, critics say it retains significant gaps, particularly regarding potential conflict between law enforcement practices and human rights protections.
One article that has drawn intense scrutiny concerns insulting the president and vice president as well as the government and state agencies. Critics fear this provision could shield officials from legitimate criticism, resembling past offenses frequently used to silence opposition against the colonial regime. There is a palpable concern this could create a climate of fear among activists and journalists.
However, the drafters of the new KUHP, primarily the Law Ministry and House of Representatives Commission III, which oversees law enforcement, argue that Article 218 is a substantial improvement over Article 134 in the previous code. The latest KUHP reclassifies this as "delik aduan" (complaint-based offense) rather than an ordinary offense, meaning that legal proceedings can only be initiated upon a formal complaint from the affected party. The maximum penalty has also been reduced from six to three years.
Deputy Law Minister Edward "Eddy" O.S. Hiariej has emphasized that only specific officials could file complaints, such as the president, the vice president and the heads of major state institutions. He also clarified that the offense applied to insults directed at institutions, not individual officeholders.
Further, Article 218(2) explicitly states that criticisms, protests and views intended to evaluate government policies are legitimate forms of expression and may not be criminalized. In a similar vein, the new KUHP treats violations related to public demonstrations as "material offenses", meaning they are punishable only if they result in tangible harm, such as public disorder, rioting or property damage.
The new code also introduces major changes to capital punishment. The death penalty is no longer categorized as a primary punishment but as a sanction of last resort. Article 100 stipulates a 10-year probationary period for death sentences and if a convict demonstrates exemplary conduct during this time, their sentence may be commuted to life imprisonment or a maximum 20 years in prison.
Lawmakers acknowledge that the new KUHP does not formally abolish the death penalty, but say this mechanism moves the judicial system away from the death penalty as a form of criminal punishment.
