Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsCan't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsThe current setup asks PLN to be planner, procurer and operator. That was useful in the past decades, but today it blurs incentives, slows competitive procurement and makes it hard for investors to price risk.
ndonesia’s power ambitions are large and justified: delivering reliable, affordable electricity that also decarbonizes the economy and attracts investment. But the way we try to reach those goals by holding prices flat for years while asking a single state utility to plan, buy, build and operate everything has created a credibility gap between plans and projects delivered.
As of 2024, according to government reports, only about 0.72 gigawatts of solar is operating against a target of 17.1 gigawatts by 2034, with 10.3 gigawatts of storage pencilled in but not yet bankable at scale. These are very clear signals to investors that there is little progress in meeting the ambitious targets set by the government.
The energy industry is a significant attractor of foreign direct investments (FDI), given that Indonesia has reduced barriers for foreign investors. The execution of renewable energy projects must become an accelerator for the growth of the green-economy and for the deployment of foreign capital.
We see the contrary happening, as over the past two years several large and small international renewable energy investment companies decided to leave the country or to minimize their expectations and take a “wait-and-see” position, harming the government’s specific FDI targets drastically in the coming years. While FDI realized in 2023 was Rp 744 trillion (US$44.27 billion) in 2024 it increased to Rp 900.2 trillion, and stayed almost flat in 2025 at Rp 900.9 trillion.
Keeping average prices unchanged for commercial and industrial (C&I) users may appear pro‑growth, but it pushes a growing bill to the budget in the form of subsidy and compensation to state utility company PLN. In 2024, the illustrative gap between average operating cost and average selling price was roughly Rp 430/kWh. On sales of 306,219 GWh, that implies roughly Rp131 trillion extra revenue just to break even, before new capex.
Freezing prices for five more years pushes ever larger compensation needs, especially if costs inflate. Eventually, the bill must be paid by taxpayers, consumers or foregone investment, while the government needs large budgets to execute its other priorities.
Some will argue that low C&I tariffs protect jobs and competitiveness. In practice, the fiscal burden raises sovereign risk, delays payments, compresses PLN’s working capital and slows grid investment, the very backbone needed for industrial growth. The better path is a predictable tariff glide path for C&I, paired with direct support for lifeline households, clear compensation rules when prices are held below formula, and hard cost‑reduction targets inside PLN and across the system.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.