TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsAnalysis: MSCI freezes Indonesia review, raises specter of rating downgrade
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Red alert: An electronic display board inside the main hall of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in South Jakarta shows an overall downward movement across most stocks during the lunch break on Jan. 29, 2026, when the IDX Composite index fell 6.3 percent after global investment firm MSCI raised concerns about free float and trading transparency. (TJP/Deni Ghifari)
M
organ Stanley Capital International (MSCI) has temporarily frozen Indonesia’s February market status review and warned of a potential downgrade from Emerging Market to Frontier Market, citing persistent structural and governance weaknesses in the equity market. Key concerns include opaque ownership structures, limited disclosure of ultimate beneficial owners, and significant price distortions in several heavily weighted stocks, particularly conglomerate- and state-owned enterprise-linked names, which have pushed the Jakarta Composite Index (JCI) higher without corresponding improvements in fundamentals.
MSCI has also pointed to weak enforcement against market manipulation and coordinated price formation, which it views as undermining market integrity and investability.
The announcement immediately rattled markets. After MSCI froze rebalancing due to investability concerns, the JCI plunged 7.35 percent to close at 8,320.56 on Jan. 28, falling well below the 8,880–8,780 support range ahead of the market open. In response, the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) and the Financial Services Authority (OJK) stressed their ongoing coordination with MSCI, highlighting steps to improve transparency, including the publication of more comprehensive free-float data and continued engagement to address MSCI’s feedback rather than dismiss it.
Concerns over price manipulation are not new to policymakers. In October 2025, Finance Minister Purbaya Yudhi Sadewa announced that the government was intensifying efforts to crack down on and prosecute individuals involved in market manipulation, commonly referred to as “pump-and-dump” schemes. At the time, the IDX requested fiscal incentives to support the market, but Purbaya declined to grant them immediately, arguing that incentives should only follow a cleanup of manipulative practices to ensure adequate protection for retail investors.
The stakes are high. MSCI is a global index provider whose country classifications, developed, emerging, or frontier, serve as benchmarks for trillions of dollars in active and passive investment funds worldwide. Indonesia’s inclusion in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index determines its eligibility for investment by a large pool of institutional investors whose mandates are strictly tied to that classification.
The MSCI episode has, unsurprisingly, intensified a growing perception among market participants that Indonesia’s financial watchdog has failed to keep pace with the mounting structural risks in the equity market. For years, foreign investors have raised concerns over selective enforcement, tolerance of extreme price movements in illiquid stocks, and the absence of credible deterrents against coordinated trading and insider-driven speculation.
MSCI’s explicit reference to weak enforcement and price distortions has now effectively elevated these critiques to the international stage, lending them far greater weight than domestic complaints from analysts or minority shareholders.
