TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsIndonesia’s online child safety needs more than an age rule
As Indonesia moves toward a March 2026 deadline for its new social media age restrictions, a "silver bullet" policy of age limits may prove ineffective without addressing deeper structural issues of platform accountability and digital privacy.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Boys will be boys: Children play online games on Nov. 27, 2024, on their mobile phones along the roadside in Jakarta. (AFP/Bay Ismoyo)
I
ndonesia’s children are navigating the digital world far faster than the country is preparing them for its inherent risks. According to UNICEF’s 2023 baseline study, Online Knowledge and Practice of Children and Parents in Indonesia, 42 percent of children have felt uncomfortable or frightened online, while 50.3 percent have been exposed to sexual imagery on social media.
In response, Communication and Digital Affairs Minister Meutya Hafid has proposed age-limit restrictions on social media to cultivate a safer, more child-friendly digital environment. This initiative has moved forward into an implementation plan under the Child Protection in Digital Space Regulation (PP Tunas), which is expected to take effect this March.
The regulation seeks to govern access based on a platform’s risk profile, with high-risk services facing stricter limitations. Current signals suggest that teenagers aged 13 to 16 will require parental consent to create and access accounts. Platforms found in violation will face a ladder of sanctions, starting with formal warnings and escalating through fines to final access termination.
While the government’s tone is firm, the clarity of enforcement remains the central question. Under the current framework, penalties fall solely on the platforms rather than the users. Furthermore, parental consent, while reasonable on paper, often weakens enforcement in practice because it is frequently granted casually without a full grasp of a platform's specific risks or algorithmic pressures.
The most significant hurdle remains age verification. Simple self-declaration is notoriously ineffective, as anyone with a smartphone knows how easily these requirements are bypassed. Conversely, more robust verification methods, such as biometric scanning or government ID integration, raise serious privacy concerns.
Without a clear and secure approach to these checks, the policy risks either being ignored by tech-savvy youth or triggering a significant public backlash over data surveillance. Policy design must also account for everyday domestic realities like shared family devices and the use of older siblings’ accounts, which no top-down policy can fully block.
A useful point of comparison is Australia, which began implementing its Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024 in December 2025. By banning children under 16 from major platforms, Australian authorities saw 4.7 million underage accounts removed in just one month, yet reports indicate that children continue to access these spaces through various backdoors.
