TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

When ‘no’ means no

Which part of “no” did we not understand?

Editorial board (The Jakarta Post)
Premium
Jakarta
Fri, November 12, 2021

Change text size

Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone

Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!

As soon as President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo, along with more than 100 other leaders attending the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26), signed the landmark deal on “no deforestation” by 2030 on Nov. 2, his Forestry and Environment Minister Siti Nurbaya Bakar put out a qualifier: For Indonesia, it does not mean a complete stop to deforestation.

Which part of “no” did we not understand?

Siti made the explanation of Indonesia’s position within 24 hours of the agreement, during a meeting with Indonesian overseas students in the Scottish city of Glasgow, the United Kingdom, where COP26 is taking place. She posted the statement to the same effect on her social media accounts, in Bahasa Indonesia, to make sure folks back home know where Indonesia stands.

Should she not have explained this to the global audience at the conference? Having signed the agreement, Indonesia owes an explanation to the world. Sure enough, within days, news reached Glasgow of Indonesia’s about-face, but not from official sources.

Is Indonesia trying to pull a fast one at COP26? On the one hand, Indonesia joins the world in the call to stop deforestation, but on the other, it is telling the nation, in Siti’s words, that there was no way that the government would sacrifice Jokowi’s “massive development programs” in the name of “zero deforestation” and “zero carbon emissions”.

That the government should take this position is not surprising, though still disappointing. For years, the government’s promise to slow deforestation has come unstuck in the name of economic development, although the real beneficiaries of these programs are not so much the people living in the forest areas as the government would claim, but the big corporations who are turning large tracts of forests primarily into oil palm plantations.

Why did Indonesia sign the deal, when it was obvious to all that the agreement means zero deforestation by 2030. No means no. No other countries with large forests to protect like Brazil and the Democratic Republic of Congo have opted out of the agreement.

to Read Full Story

  • Unlimited access to our web and app content
  • e-Post daily digital newspaper
  • No advertisements, no interruptions
  • Privileged access to our events and programs
  • Subscription to our newsletters
or

Purchase access to this article for

We accept

TJP - Visa
TJP - Mastercard
TJP - GoPay

Redirecting you to payment page

Pay per article

When ‘no’ means no

Rp 35,000 / article

1
Create your free account
By proceeding, you consent to the revised Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.
Already have an account?

2
  • Palmerat Barat No. 142-143
  • Central Jakarta
  • DKI Jakarta
  • Indonesia
  • 10270
  • +6283816779933
2
Total Rp 35,000

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.

Change text size options

Customize your reading experience by adjusting the text size to small, medium, or large—find what’s most comfortable for you.

Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone

Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!

Continue in the app

Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.