TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Big Tech in Indonesia may start paying news outlets for content
Media groups look to Australian precedent to set terms
Change Size
I
ndonesian media groups are pushing for a draft regulation to make news aggregators pay publishers for displayed content, a regulation meant to support the domestic news industry.
Sources told The Jakarta Post that the new regulation was based on Australia’s News Media Bargaining Code – the first law of its kind in the world – passed in February this year. The law requires aggregators such as Google and Facebook to negotiate fees with publishers.
Read also: Australia passes bill to compel Google, Facebook to pay for news
The proposed regulation addresses the years-old complaint of publishers, which have been losing advertising revenue to online aggregators, that tech giants were benefiting from using news content in search results or other features without proper compensation.
Indonesian Cyber Media Association (AMSI) chair Wenseslaus “Wens” Manggut said on Nov. 15 that the problem was exacerbated by the fact that web traffic landed more frequently on low-quality content like clickbait, hoaxes and hate speech.
“This kind of ecosystem provides no incentive for proper journalism,” Wens said. “Our work requires effort that is supposed to be valued. If left to an open fight, we would be done for”.
The draft is the work of media associations and the Press Council through a media sustainability task force. The proposed regulation also gives more responsibility to aggregators to vet online content.
The proposal comes a few months after President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo remarked on National Press Day on Feb. 9 that he would instruct his ministers to follow up “regarding draft regulations that protect publisher rights.”
Alliance of Independent Journalists (AJI) chair Sasmito, who also backed the proposed regulation, emphasized that news publishers were not “anti-digital platforms”, but just wanted a fair return on journalistic content, especially to help sustain the news industry.
“News companies should not die in the digital era, as they are the pillars of democracy,” he said.
Jason Tedjasukmana, head of corporate communications at Google Indonesia, told The Jakarta Post on Monday that Google had provided billions of dollars to support the creation of quality journalism in the digital age through direct funding to news organizations, revenue sharing via ad networks, training and Google News Showcase.
“All of these have led us to paying news organizations significant amounts of money,” he said, adding that Google was committed to supporting open access to information.
Facebook Indonesia did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The regulation
The proposed bill outlines a mechanism for tech companies and news publishers to decide fees and the new responsibilities of platforms in filtering online content, according to an October draft obtained by the Post.
Tech companies may first make a blanketing initial price offering for all news publishers.
If publishers reject the initial offer, the proposed bill requires tech platforms to individually negotiate fees with publishers under the supervision of a to-be-established News Media and Digital Platform Bargaining Agency.
The agency would first vet news publishers over their ability to carry out negotiations based on content, circulation, compliance and annual revenue.
If the platform and publisher fail to reach an agreement, they may assign an independent arbitrator to decide the fee.
The proposed bill also requires companies to filter and take down hoaxes and hate speech, prioritize crawling and indexing for journalistic content from news publishers and authenticate content.
Furthermore, tech companies would be required to inform publishers about algorithmic changes that may affect web traffic, paywalls and advertising revenue.
The Communications and Information Technology Minister would assign the legal entities responsible for bargaining news fees and vetting online content.
On Oct. 19, the task force handed over the proposed draft to the communications ministry for further discussion, then it will be passed to the House of Representatives for deliberation.
The ministry’s public information and communication director general, Usman Kansong, said on Nov. 15 that the draft had been submitted to the Office of the Coordinating Political, Legal and Security Affairs Minister to decide the best approach to put the regulation into effect.
“The coordinating political, legal and security affairs minister has responded. He has invited the Press Council and media associations to further discuss what next,” Usman said.
He said three options were on the table: passing a new law, revising prevailing laws or issuing a new government regulation (PP).
Regulators expected passing a new law would take too long as the House has locked its 2020-2024 National Legislation Program (Prolegnas).
But regulators were also considering passing the proposal through revisions in the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law), Business Competition Law and Copyright Law, the former two of which were included within the latest Prolegnas.
The fastest way would be to pass a government regulation as it did not require lawmakers’ approval, although the final product would not be as powerful as a law.
Read also: Facebook strikes deal with News Corp to license Australian news
Drawbacks
Rendy Novalianto, a senior analyst at consultancy Bower Group Asia, said the regulation might contain flaws because it was sought to implement an Australia-based regulation in Indonesia. The two countries have different market landscapes that require different policies.
A case in point, Australia’s regulation only incentivized tech companies to ink deals with big publishers, leaving behind small publishers, he said.
Such an arrangement would widen the gap between small and big news publishers in Indonesia, most of which are backed by conglomerates such as CT Corp, Emtek, Media Group and MNC Group.
“It's important to base the draft on an Indonesian context and not just copy-paste from another country,” he said via email, adding that regulators needed to conduct robust public consultations to ensure that public and industry interests were well represented.
He opined that giving the platforms shared responsibility for misinformation would be “very dangerous”, as businesses, which tended to be risk-averse, would likely over-censor news.
Nailul Huda, who heads the Center of Innovation and the Digital Economy at the Institute for Development of Economics and Finance (Indef), said it would be challenging to convince tech companies to follow the regulation as they could argue publishers had benefitted from platforms through greater readerships and access to news material.
“I think it is going to be difficult to run it in Indonesia,” Nailul said.
Kominfo’s Usman said the regulation would improve smaller news publishers’ bargaining position as well, arguing that it was designed to make a fair playing field.
