TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Judges refuse to hear testimony of Ahok's Muslim godbrother

Callistasia Anggun Wijaya (The Jakarta Post)
Jakarta
Tue, March 7, 2017 Published on Mar. 7, 2017 Published on 2017-03-07T13:50:54+07:00

Change text size

Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone

Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Judges refuse to hear testimony of Ahok's Muslim godbrother Jakarta Governor Basuki "Ahok" Tjahaja Purnama talks with his lawyer during a hearing at the North Jakarta District Court on Dec. 21. (Antara/POOL/M Agung Rajasa/via JP)

J

udges presiding over the blasphemy trial of Jakarta Governor Basuki “Ahok” Tjahaja Purnama refused to hear testimony on Tuesday from his Muslim godbrother, Analta Amir, as the latter had attended a previous hearing.

Presiding judge Dwiarso Budi Santiarto made the decision after complaints from prosecutors, who said Analta had attended one of Ahok’s previous hearings though it was prohibited for a witness to do so.

Analta admitted that he had once attended an earlier hearing, during which the court heard testimony from witnesses presented by prosecutors.  

“As the witness has heard testimonies of other witnesses, the judges believe this witness cannot be questioned,” Dwiarso said during a hearing held by the North Jakarta District Court at the Agriculture Ministry in Ragunan, South Jakarta.

(Read also: Ex-running mate defends Ahok in hearing)

He added that the court’s judges had reminded anyone expected to be presented as a witness in the trial to leave the courtroom before each hearing started.

Dwiarso said Ahok’s lawyers should have reminded Analta to leave the courtroom. 

He said witnesses could attend some court hearings but not those that featured witness testimony. He added that Ahok’s lawyers were allowed to present another witness to replace Analta.

While accepting the judges’ decision, Ahok’s legal team said the court should have heard Analta’s testimony. One member of the team said prevailing rules only prohibited witnesses from talking to other witnesses, not their presence at hearings. “Analta never communicated with other witnesses,” the lawyer said. (ebf)

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.

Share options

Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!

Change text size options

Customize your reading experience by adjusting the text size to small, medium, or large—find what’s most comfortable for you.

Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone

Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!

Continue in the app

Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.