TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsEquity market: Why we are bullish on China
In our Blue Paper we identify 50 Chinese firms in these New Economy sectors that are “unicorns,” that is, they achieved private market valuations of over US$1 billion prior to their initial public offerings. That is more than the number of unicorns in the rest of the world (excluding the United States) put together.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Chinese 100-yuan (RMB) bank notes being counted at a bank in Huaibei, in eastern China's Anhui province. (AFP/File)
T
he core message of the recent Morgan Stanley Blue Paper “Why We Are Bullish on China” is that Chinese equities can continue to outperform emerging-market equities in the future, as they have done for some time.
Cumulative outperformance over the last 15 years for MSCI China versus MSCI EM has been 5,000 basis points, or around 3 percent per year. China has also outperformed emerging markets over both five and ten years, and not by small amounts. Total returns have averaged 5 percent per year in US dollar terms over those periods, and 13 percent per year over the last 15 years.
For us, being overweight China equities in our recommended allocation to clients investing in the EM space is not unusual. Our structural bullishness in the 10 years I have covered China equities at Morgan Stanley is starkly different from that of the consensus amongst global investors and even EM specialist managers, who have been and remain underweight China.
Indeed, the latter group is running a near record underweight on China versus the benchmark of 500 basis points currently, and at no point in the last 15 years have EM specialists ever been anything but underweight China.
So what is it that the consensus is so worried about and what are they missing which we think is positive? In our view, consensus thinking on China has always been too caught up in the macro debate, particularly in relation to debt sustainability, excess capacity and more recently foreign exchange risk.
Consensus has been insufficiently focused on identifying the sources of China’s outperformance, which lie in the market having had a materially higher return on equity (ROE) than the EM average over the cycle, and hence higher earnings growth in US dollar terms.
We believe the roots of that phenomenon lie not so much in an economy that is becoming more leveraged, though it has, but in an equity market that is evolving faster than the overall economy by becoming more consumerand services-oriented as well as more private sector-driven.
