Nevertheless, the Papuan identity has always remained tightly interwoven within Indonesia’s nation-building narrative.
ssues in Papua, have always gathered widespread attention. A recent “yellow-card” episode involving the chairman of the University of Indonesia’s student executive body (BEM UI) and President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo is linked to problems of development in Papua whereas in Australia, issues related to Papua have also often grabbed media attention.
To date, policy discourse on Papua has taken various angles. One of the more dominant angles is the “ethno-nationalism” lens, expressed most visibly by writers like Jim Elmslie and Richard Chauvel, who question the compatibility of the “Papuan” and “Indonesian” identity due to historical and cultural disjunctures. Separation is a logical consequences, according to this view.
Nevertheless, the Papuan identity has always remained tightly interwoven within Indonesia’s nation-building narrative. Active participation by local leaders such as Silas Papare, Marthen Indey, Frans Kaisiepo and JA Dimara during military operations in the early 1960s to seize Dutch-controlled Western New Guinea and diplomatic efforts to push for the territory’s integration into Indonesia, signifies the role of Papuans in constructing a common identity of national struggle against Dutch colonialism.
The degree to which Papuans actively play a part in public service and leadership is another testament to this integrative nation-building process.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.