TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Non-sexy type of leadership that really matters

  • Robert Hooijberg, Dan Denison, John Antonakis & Nancy Lane

    The Jakarta Post

  /   Sat, November 29, 2014   /  12:28 pm

Teaching and research on leadership are currently too focused on transformational and transactional leadership.

Transformational leadership entails setting a vision, being charismatic, and inspiring employees to perform better. Transactional leadership is concerned with ensuring that employee efforts are aligned with those of the organization by using incentives and disincentives, or carrots and sticks.

Because transformational leadership focuses on the big picture and the inspirational part of leadership, and transactional leadership concentrates on enforcing obligations, there is a huge '€œnon-sexy'€ area of leadership that remains underrepresented in both research and in educational programs '€” instrumental leadership.

What is instrumental leadership?

Instrumental leadership focuses on the '€œwhats'€ and '€œhows'€ of leadership: the nitty-gritty details. It has two main dimensions. The first, strategic leadership, consists of understanding an organization'€™s environment, and identifying its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. This part also involves strategy formulation and implementation as well as setting policies and goals.

The second dimension is work facilitation, which helps followers achieve their goals through clarifying how to get there, providing the required resources, monitoring performance and correcting errors in a constructive way.  In executive education, it is much more fun for both participants and professors to focus on developing an inspirational vision and strategy rather than making difficult instrumental decisions.

Why does it matter?

Leaders frequently do not think through strategic decisions nor act in ways which are consistent with their organizations'€™ vision and strategy. Included in these leaders are those who formulated these very visions and strategies. This misalignment can result in a number of problematic situations in which organizations are being run by charismatic leaders, whose visions are unrealistic or whose decisions do not match their company'€™s strategy and environmental conditions.

Leaders must remain attuned to what is happening in real time, both inside and outside the organization, and not just blindly deliver and execute '€œvisions'€. Although it is not as sexy as setting a vision and being charismatic or being a great mentor and motivator, instrumental leadership is essential in order for activities related to vision and strategy to have any real meaning and to ensure that the company stays in business.

How do we know?

Domain-specific expertise, an important ingredient of instrumental leadership, is often given short shrift. But research in this area, conducted by us, as well as on similar area '€œexpert leadership'€, shows that leaders who have significant industry experience are more effective than those who do not.

According to Professor Amanda Goodall'€™s extensive research, having experts as managers predicts better performance across different domains such as Formula One and basketball teams as well as hospitals. Similarly, Professor John Antonakis'€™s research clearly shows that deep knowledge of the nuts and bolts of the business you are leading makes a big difference to organizational effectiveness outcomes and matters more than both transformational and transactional leadership. The results of Professor Robert Hooijberg'€™s organizational culture research, with IMD Professor Dan Denison, on how well companies translate their vision and strategy into action, also showcases the importance of instrumental leadership.

This research also shows that whereas there is a significant relationship between transformational leadership and effectiveness, the effect of instrumental leadership is much more important.

How can we implement instrumental leadership?

The current focus on transformational and transactional leadership must not outweigh the non-sexy role of instrumental leadership. Managers must cultivate the needed knowhow to develop true expertise over time, which depends on how they have been developed. They should draw upon all styles to lead: make tough choices, have difficult conversations, hold people accountable, ensure intra-organizational alignment and follow through on vision delivery. The challenge for leaders is to ensure that their visions are aligned with their choices and to establish processes that are consistent with their vision. They often feel ill-prepared, under- or unsupported and face conflicting interests. Yet, instrumental leadership is essential for capturing the full value of transformational leadership and vision implementation.  

Developing instrumental leadership requires rolling up your sleeves and making sure that the nuts and bolts are in place. Although this requires experience and dedication, the payoff in terms of effective leadership is worth it. (Robert Hooijberg, Dan Denison, John Antonakis & Nancy Lane)

_________________

Hooijberg is professor of Organizational Behavior at IMD. Denison is professor of Management and Organization at IMD. Antonakis is professor of organizational behavior at the University of Lausanne. Lane is research associate and executive coach at IMD.

Your premium period will expire in 0 day(s)

close x
Get 50% off for Premium Subscription

Renew your subscription to get unlimited access