TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

If the watchman is restrained, investors flee

An Indonesian friend involved in a messy divorce was advised by colleagues not to hire a lawyer

Duncan Graham (The Jakarta Post)
Malang, East Java
Tue, October 15, 2019

Share This Article

Change Size

If the watchman is restrained, investors flee

A

span>An Indonesian friend involved in a messy divorce was advised by colleagues not to hire a lawyer. Instead he should bribe the judge more than his estranged wife was paying.

Being a moral person he refused, believing it’s every citizen’s duty to help purge corruption from the nation. He paid an attorney and lost his case.

A local personal pain but one indicating a national ill making investors quake. Surreptitiously sliding an envelope across a desk anywhere in the archipelago is risky business for Australians — home and away.

Bribing a public official is a crime here in the republic and over there in the Commonwealth; the dirty deal may have been done any place between Sabang and Merauke but a prosecution can be launched anywhere between Perth and Sydney.

The penalties are harsh: Up to 10 years in an Aussie prison, or a fine of A$1.78 million (US$1.20 million) — or both. Drug runners get less.

President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo frequently says he wants funds from foreigners to help boost the economy. So who to dial should a joint venture turn to custard through corruption?

Not the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) if its authority gets weakened by lawmakers. Even if the proposers deny changes will neuter the commission’s powers, the view from afar is likely to be negative. As the seers say, perception is reality.


TII’s Corruption Perception Index puts Indonesia in 79th place, a marked improvement since 2014.


Access to the rule of law delivered impartially is important to overseas entrepreneurs; if the scene’s not clean they just trouser (or handbag) their wallets and head to international departures.

Giving evidence to the Australian Parliamentary Joint Standing Committee on Treaties in Perth recently, Louise McGrath, national manager of the Australian Industry Group said: “When companies aren’t sure of the risk they simply don’t invest. If we look at the numbers, I think New Zealand is the beneficiary of our greatest investment overseas because it’s very low risk.

“We’re not taking the high-risk and potentially high-rewards investments into places like Indonesia […] [when] the environment seems risky, companies simply don’t invest in that market.”

The committee is examining the Indonesia-Australia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (IA-CEPA) signed in March, though yet to be ratified by legislatures in both nations.

Other witnesses stressed that the Indonesian government will have to tackle corruption and the “regulatory chill” of excess red tape seriously if it wants to entice Australian dollars.

Last year, the Investment Coordinating Board (BPKM) fell short of its investment target of Rp 765 trillion ($54.10 billion) by 9 percent. Phil Turtle, national president of the Australia Indonesia Business Council, told the committee: “The elephant in the room is corruption.

“When I’m talking to Australian businesses about contemplating Indonesia, it’s a bit like the real estate saying — location, location, location — it’s corruption, corruption, corruption.”

Two years ago, research by Transparency International Indonesia (TII) suggested corruption added about 10 percent to production costs. It also claimed that 17 percent of businesses collapsed because competitors bribed officials.

TII’s Corruption Perception Index puts Indonesia in 79th place, a marked improvement since 2014 when President Jokowi was first elected.

In that year it ranked 107. As teacher report cards say about bright laggards: “Improving, but could do better if he tried harder.”

The TII added: ‘Corruption is present in all three branches of government in Indonesia and is one of the major constraints on the political leadership’s capacity to govern effectively.

“Political corruption is particularly pervasive, and Parliament is widely considered the most corrupt institution. Similarly, bureaucratic corruption is rampant and a large part of the population reports paying bribes for services.”

It also noted the KPK’s “stellar performance” and society’s “positive view of the government’s efforts to fight corruption.” That was before law changes were proposed.

At present, Indonesia doesn’t feature in the top 20 nations where Australian investors feel comfy about depositing cash and assets.

According to Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, while the United States and the United Kingdom remain the most favored places for Australians to park dollars, pledges to Asia have increased dramatically over the past decade.

Recipients include China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea and Taiwan; investment in this cohort has more than tripled from $108 billion to $395 billion.

Though not Indonesia; Southeast Asia’s largest economy gets only $10.7 billion from its southern neighbor. That’s less than half of one percent of the $2. 5 trillion posted abroad.

If the keen but concerned traders like Turtle are correct, Indonesia needs a clean place to lure dollars from Down Under. That means maintaining a watchman ready and able to keep the environment corruption-free.

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.