Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsCan't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsRCEP is widely identified as an instrument for regional resilience: a platform for market expansion, supply chain diversification and rules-based certainty.
he rules-based trading order is under pressure. It is being dismantled, selectively, by the very powers that built it. When ASEAN economic ministers held their retreat earlier this month, the immediate concerns were shared: energy supply disruption from an escalating Middle East conflict and heightening global trade uncertainties from the sweeping Section 301 investigations by the United States affecting most ASEAN member states.
These are symptoms of a deeper structural shift, where rules-based frameworks need to adapt and coexist with overt geostrategic competition. In this environment, middle powers face the twin challenges of upholding the rules-based multilateral system and finding its more sustainable democratic form.
The statement adopted by the ministers reiterated the message of unity, coordination and commitment to regional integration and a rules-based multilateral system. What the statement omitted was the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), the world’s largest trade agreement initiated and led by ASEAN. This is despite the leaders’ clear directions at last year's 5th RCEP Summit.
That omission matters. Experts and officials convened at the recent Track 1.5 RCEP Dialogue last week, on the sidelines of the 12th RCEP Joint Committee Meeting, were direct: RCEP remains relevant and is even more important and urgent now; business as usual is not an option.
It is worth recalling what RCEP represented when it was signed in November 2020, in the depths of the COVID-19 pandemic. Fifteen economies came together under a single trade agreement, convened by ASEAN. At a moment when global cooperation was fracturing, it demonstrated ASEAN’s growing role in regional economic governance. That achievement should not be squandered by inertia.
While RCEP is often criticized for its level of ambition, it successfully brings together countries of different levels of development under shared trade and investment rules. RCEP remains the world’s largest free trade agreement (FTA).
Given the global trade uncertainties and rising aggressive unilateralism, RCEP holds great potential to strengthen regional resilience and business certainty. One rule-bending superpower is one too many. RCEP parties include ASEAN largest trading partners. Ensuring that they are bound by shared rules will benefit ASEAN.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.