Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsCan't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsThough the 2006 Citizenship Law was hailed as a landmark in its day, it needs amending to reflect the modern-day realities of 2026 so Indonesians of diaspora communities and mixed marriages can contribute to and serve their homeland, if they choose.
aw No. 12/2006 on citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia has served as a landmark piece of legislation for the past two decades, particularly for children of mixed-heritage families: those born from marriages between Indonesian citizens (WNI) and foreign nationals (WNA).
According to the Great Dictionary of the Indonesian Language (KBBI), mixed-heritage individuals represent the intersection of two cultures and often possess a unique dual identity that makes them natural global citizens. Meanwhile, the broader Indonesian diaspora, those who have migrated and settled abroad, continues to grow, forming a vast network of potential contributors to the nation’s future.
At its inception, the Citizenship Law was hailed as a milestone for human rights and gender equality in Indonesia and was highly revolutionary compared to its predecessor Law No. 62/1958. It provided long-overdue legal protection to Indonesian women married to foreign men, ensuring that their children were not rendered stateless or automatically foreign.
It also introduced the concept of limited dual citizenship, allowing these children to hold two passports until the age of 21. For 20 years, this served as a "role model" law.
However, the world in 2026 is vastly different from that in 2006. As the global economy becomes increasingly interconnected and technology erases physical borders, our citizenship framework must evolve. We are currently witnessing a war for talent where nations like Singapore, Germany and Australia are actively courting skilled young professionals.
If Indonesia does not adapt, we risk a massive "brain drain", where talented children of mixed heritage "flee" to other nations simply because our administrative processes are too rigid or their window of choice is too narrow.
While the 2006 law was a step forward, it left significant gaps. For instance, mixed-heritage children born before the law’s passage were given a strict four-year window (Aug. 1, 2006, to Aug. 1, 2010) to determine their citizenship status. Many families, unaware of the deadline or caught in bureaucratic red tape, missed this window.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.