Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

ASEAN has but one choice only: Itself

Ministers and central bank governors including Philippines Finance Minister Carlos Dominguez (2nd L), Japanese Finance Minister Taro Aso (C), Bank of Japan Governor Haruhiko Kuroda (2nd R), Chinese Vice-Minister of Finance Shi Yaobin pose during a photo session at ASEAN+3 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors' Meeting on the sideline of Asian Development Bank (ADB)'s annual meeting in Yokohama, south of Tokyo, Japan May 5, 2017. (Reuters/Issei Kato)
Chiba Akira
Jakarta   ●   Fri, November 13 2020

The narrative that two superpowers are pressing ASEAN to make a choice is a staple of journalism. But is that truly the case?

International trade in the region in the 14th century already had a well-established structure. China was the dominant factor of trade, the rule of which was based on a tributary system. This was an exchange of loyalty and profit, in which neighboring countries sent messengers to contribute offerings as vassals, while the emperor bestowed sometimes 10 times worth of gifts.

The South China Sea was an important trade route. The Maritime Silk Road, as it is referred to by China today, is always exemplified in this context as the transportation route used by Cheng Ho (Zheng He). The role played by Cheng Ho to recruit tributary states by traveling to more than 30 countries along the Maritime Silk Road was instrumental indeed.

to Read Full Story


Starting from IDR 55,000/month

  • Unlimited access to our content on web and app
  • No advertising, no interruption
  • A bonus subscription to share
  • Bookmark and night mode functions on app
  • Subscription to our newsletters

We accept