TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsThe undeniable courage of Ahmad Ishomuddin
Ahmad Ishomuddin is a young cleric who shocked us for his courage by being an expert witness in the Ahok trial on March 21.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Ahok’s blasphemy case has further exposed Indonesia’s progressive Islamic movement, which currently has proven to be fragile and weak in its ability to spread its message to a general audience. (Media Indonesia/POOL/Ramdani/via JP)
T
he Jakarta gubernatorial election has escalated another dimension outside the political race — a massive and systematic use of religion to win votes.
This is actually not new to our elections. What makes the difference in the Jakarta election is the historic, first use of the Blasphemy Law in a gubernatorial election to charge one candidate, the incumbent Basuki “Ahok” Tjahaja Purnama, for allegedly insulting Islam.
The controversy opens not only legal, but, more importantly, theological debates about Islam. However, propagators of the Blasphemy Law seem to dominate Islamic public discourse here.
Almost all the so-called moderate Muslim organizations support, to some extent, the accusation that Ahok has insulted Islam, excluding the executive body of Nahdlatul Ulama (NU).
This is evident in the ongoing trial in which witnesses presented by the state prosecutors are mostly among the religious leaders of NU, Muhammadiyah, the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) and the Islam Defenders Front (FPI).
It is a tiny minority who are bravely expressing their opinion that Ahok has not blasphemed religion.
The silence of many progressive Muslim scholars and activists to speak their opinions on Ahok’s blasphemy case is mostly due to their fear to be considered as defenders of Ahok, who is of Chinese descent and a Christian.
