TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Why centralizing procurement matters
According to the KPK, procurement is the second-most vulnerable field to corruption in the country, as evident in the myriad of graft cases related to the process.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Civil service: An official of the Civil Registry and Population Agency (Disdukcapil) print e-IDs at the agency's office in Tasikmalaya city, West Java, on Oct.24. (Antara/Adeng Bustomi)
D
espite their differences, corporations share similarities when it comes to purchasing items to support their operations, such as IT networking and building management. Looking closely at those needs, procurement stands as a facilitator to get the requirements that companies have to fulfill.
Some say, however, that procurement is an opportunity to increase margin, while some others call it a potential silent killer of company profit.
During project deals, most companies focus on revenue generation, but lack attention to controlling total costs of ownership. Owing to its nature as a blind spot, the potential threats, including fraud, might not be easily identified for various reasons.
According to the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), procurement is the second-most vulnerable field to corruption in the country, as evident in the myriad of graft cases related to the process. Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW) 2015 data said Indonesia had lost Rp 3.11 trillion (US$230 million) as a result of corruption in the procurement sector alone.
