TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsIn defense of KPU and the 2019 general election
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Clock is ticking: Staff members of a local election commission count ballots in Pasar Minggu, Jakarta. Vote counting at the subdistrict level is expected to take 17 days, after which the results are to be submitted to the district or city level. (The Jakarta Post/Seto Wardhana )
I
s there such a thing as a perfect election in this world? No. Read every single election observation report from any country and you will find many incidents of fraud. There is no “perfect” election, although we — as election observers — seek “free and fair elections”.
How does one determine that an election is free and fair? There are many international guidelines that provide an answer. One example is the Dili Indicators of Democratic Elections of the Asian Network for Free Elections (Anfrel).
The five indicators of nations with free and fair elections are: they have an overall legal framework that provides universal suffrage and guarantees basic freedom; a level playing field; a professional electoral management body; inclusive and meaningful citizen participation; and mechanisms to ensure effective, efficient and impartial electoral justice and electoral dispute resolution.
We have been observing foreign elections for around 10 years across nine countries, and we would like to share some of our experience that has led us to conclude that Indonesia’s April 17 general election was indeed free and fair.
One positive fact is the high voter turnout of over 80 percent, even higher compared to the 70 percent voter turnout in the 2014 general election. Overseas voter turnout also increased with 65 percent compared to the previous 22 percent.
The higher the turnout, the stronger the election result is justified, since voting is not compulsory in Indonesia as it is in Australia. Many countries in Europe are facing a decline in voter turnout. More people participating also gives less room for fraud.
Higher participation is positive if it is inclusive and meaningful. In Indonesia, people participate with full awareness, as they can discuss any candidate or political party contesting the elections without fear.
