TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsPlanned cyber law revisions won't fix free speech issues, rights body says
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Demonstrators rally outside the State Palace on Jan. 8, 2019, to demand that the government abolish articles in the Electronic Information and Transaction (ITE) Law that they considered a threat to the freedom of expression. (JP/Seto Wardhana)
T
he government's proposed revisions to the contentious Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law will not be enough to stop undue state infringements on the right to free speech, a study by the National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM) has found.
On Wednesday, Komnas HAM released the findings of a study, involving independent experts, on the proposed changes.
The government is pushing for a partial revision of the law to introduce a stricter definition of online defamation. The provisions as they stand have long been criticized by activists for their use in curbing free speech and silencing government critics.
The draft revision would make online defamation criminal only in cases where the speech in question was found to have “the intent to harm an individual's honor”.
But this, according to researcher Cekli Pratiwi, who is also a human rights lecturer at Muhammadiyah University in Malang, East Java, could still be used to silence critics.
She said the provisions on hate speech remained vague and "very subjective".
"Overall, the proposed changes might not solve the fundamental problem in the ITE Law: the criminalization of free speech," Cekli said.
