TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsAnalysis: ‘Laptopgate’ Will the AGO go beyond scapegoating
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Education and Culture Minister Nadiem Makarim makes a gesture after the announcement of the Indonesia Onward Cabinet on Oct. 23. (JP/Seto Wardhana) (JP/Seto Wardhana)
A
Rp 9.9 trillion (US$610 million) corruption scandal involving the procurement of school laptops by the Education, Culture, Research and Technology Ministry from 2019 to 2022, under the leadership of Nadiem Makarim, has captured national attention.
The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) has launched an investigation and investigators have questioned 28 witnesses to date, but so far it has focused on only three of Nadiem’s former expert staffers: Fiona Handayani, Jurist Tan, and Ibrahim Arief. The three staffers have had their homes searched and property seized, including electronic devices and documents.
The critical question, however, is whether the AGO is prepared to pursue high-level officials within the ministry, even the former minister himself. The focus on low-level staffers raises questions because such employees typically have no power to make final decisions, merely serving in an advisory capacity. Any involvement with policy on their part would have required the minister’s sign-off.
Nadiem has publicly denied any involvement in the scandal. “I am ready to cooperate and support law enforcement authorities by providing statements or clarification if needed,” the former minister said.
He has defended the program, saying that over 97 percent of the funds were used to distribute 1.1 million Chromebooks to 77,000 schools. He also justified the choice of laptop, citing their lower cost and free software compared to more expensive Windows laptops.
However, the AGO and critics question the reasoning behind the exclusive procurement of Chromebooks. The trials the ministry conducted from 2018 to 2019 had shown Chromebooks to be ineffective in many remote and rural areas due to limited internet access. Despite these findings, the ministry pushed ahead with the procurement, raising concerns about potential ulterior motives.
Adding to the suspicion is how the procurement specification appeared tailored for six local firms as the only vendors capable of supplying the Chromebooks while also meeting the domestic content rule. These six companies were awarded a Rp 700 billion government contract to provide 165,000 laptops: Acer Manufacturing Indonesia, PT Bangga Technology Indonesia, PT Evercoss Technology Indonesia, PT Supertone, PT Tera Data Indonesia, and PT Zyrexindo Mandiri Buana.
