Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsCan't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsMigrant fishers holding transit visas cannot report their grievances to authorities without fear of deportation and criminalization.
Calling home: Indonesian fishers hold posters on Aug. 11, 2022, aboard a vessel as it docks at Kaohsiung Port in Taiwan, asking for the government’s help to repatriate them. The fishermen were reportedly stuck on the boat, believed to belong to a Hong Kong company, since February 2022 without pay. (Antara/Fahmi Fahmal Sukardi)
s the world celebrated Human Rights Day last week, many remain without basic rights, especially those working on fishing vessels. This is commonly reported in the global fishing industry, even in Europe.
Earlier this year, six Indonesian migrant fishers were abandoned for eight months while employed on a Portuguese-flagged fishing fleet, left without adequate pay, repatriation and remedy. Meanwhile, on vessels flagged to the United Kingdom and Ireland, Indonesian and Filipino migrant fishers continue to face discrimination in terms of salary, working hours and social protection vis-à-vis European fishers.
The dire human rights situation is not because of the absence of human rights and labor legislation. In fact, the UK and Portugal have ratified ILO Convention 188 on Work in Fishing C-188 (C-188), the international agreement addressing decent work in fishing vessels. In addition to weak monitoring and enforcement, insecure immigration status contributes to the heightened vulnerability of migrant fishers.
In terms of immigration status, migrant fishers are issued different types of visas depending on the fishing grounds in which they work. Those employed on fishing vessels operating in territorial waters typically receive work visas. Meanwhile, migrant fishers working on board distant-water fleets operating beyond territorial waters are issued transit visas. This practice is evident in Taiwan, South Korea and the UK.
Those differences determine the rights and treatments that migrant fishers are entitled to. A work visa provides legal recognition to fishers as workers and gives them access to basic protections such as social security, healthcare, legal aid, fair wages, safer mobility and reduced risks of deportation or retaliation.
However, a transit visa gives fishers an insecure immigration status because they are not recognized as workers within this scheme. They are, thus, excluded from the labor standards in the national legal framework. Furthermore, their mobility is far more restricted than workers under the working visa scheme.
A transit visa only allows fishers to enter the port and remain within this area while waiting for their departure to the international waters. They cannot access areas outside of the port absent vessel owners’ permission.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.