Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsCan't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsThe government should put an end to the various rules that stifle investment and instead focus on building a healthy, competitive business climate that ensures legal certainty.
s the year draws to a close and we welcome 2027, Indonesia’s palm oil sector stands on a foundation of extraordinary resilience. Over the past few decades, this “green gold” commodity has weathered a relentless wave of challenges, ranging from the relentless negative campaigns, increasingly stringent international market standards, to the uncertain dynamics of the domestic business climate.
The industry has also proven resilient in navigating various restrictive policies, such as the turmoil surrounding the domestic market obligation (DMO), the increase in the mandatory blending ratio of biodiesel (B50), the repossessing of overlapped plantations and legal uncertainty regarding land-use. However, this resilience certainly has its limits. As the backbone of foreign exchange earnings and the national economy, palm oil cannot continue to be burdened by legal uncertainty and contradictory regulations.
Looking ahead to 2027, the government should put an end to the various rules that stifle investment and instead focus on building a healthy, competitive business climate that ensures legal certainty. These are the key topics of discussions at the annual Indonesian Palm Oil Conference (IPOC), organized by the Indonesian Palm Oil Association (GAPKI) in Bali on Nov. 11–13.
One issue that warrants close attention is the government’s decision to grant PT Agrinas Palma Nusantara (Agrinas) a palm oil concession of 400,000 hectares in Papua. The development plan outlines a fairly clear land-use division, with 250,000 ha set aside for cultivation, while another 150,000 ha is designated as conservation zones and customary land.
Legally, this 400,000-ha automatically changes the status of land that was previously designated as forest area into “other land use” (APL). This sets a new precedent and a model for revisiting the national forest land use map to accommodate the development of sustainable, ethical palm oil cultivations.
Hence, the issue of oil palm expansion in Papua goes beyond simply determining a land use area or allocating concession, but to ensure that land-use decisions have a clear and accountable spatial basis in alignment with the National One Map Policy. Consequently, the designation of areas must be based on environmental and social impact assessments, evaluations of conservation and carbon stock values (HCV and HCS) criteria, and extensive consultation to obtain consent from indigenous communities.
Degraded land suitable for agricultural activities may be considered for exclusion from the forestry sector. Conversely, areas with high carbon sequestration potential and biodiversity hotspots must be preserved from development.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.